-Original Message-
From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
Sent: woensdag 7 mei 2014 15:44
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1593015 - in
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: fs.c fs.h
Author: stefan2
Date: Wed May 7 13:43:55 2014
New
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
If the file with the cached credentials (the file under subversion
config dir/auth/svn.simple) is read-only, 'svn' 1.8 (on Windows) will
behave as follows after a password change:
[[[
C:\svn ls
On 10.05.2014 05:26, Andreas Stieger wrote:
Hello,
I found a compiler warning in trunk on a potentially undefined operation
when using an increment operator on a variable referenced in the same
expression. This is on gcc 4.3.4, does not happen in gcc 4.7 and up.
Treated as an error in some
If the file with the cached credentials (the file under subversion
config dir/auth/svn.simple) is read-only, 'svn' 1.8 (on Windows) will
behave as follows after a password change:
[[[
C:\svn ls https://svn.example.com/svn
Authentication realm: https://svn.example.com:443 SVN
Password for
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:05:53PM +0400, Sergey Raevskiy wrote:
The problem can be fixed by merging
subversion/trunk:r1553501,1553556,1559197
with --accept=theirs-conflict (+ adding a missing svn_error_t *err;
declaration).
This worked for me, all tests passed, including new one
On 4/30/14, 11:00 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
The 1.7.17 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on May 7th so please
try and get your
The problem can be fixed by merging subversion/trunk:r1553501,1553556,1559197
with --accept=theirs-conflict (+ adding a missing svn_error_t *err;
declaration).
This worked for me, all tests passed, including new one (Windows 8,
httpd 2.2.27, svn 1.8.8, http x fsfs).
BTW, should this be filed
We planned to release a year after 1.8.0, it doesn't look like we're going to
make that. However, we can still manage to a release out with some delay after
that. To that end I suggest that we need to start moving towards a 1.9.x
branch.
We'd planned to defer new development and concentrate on
I added my signature to Windows build and give it a +1. I will leave it to
you to decide if you want to count it.
I was able to verify the zip file, build successfully as well as run the
JavaHL tests successfully.
The build has been failing for me for a while when linking the C tests. It
is
Hi,
On 15 May 2014, at 15:49, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
Good catch, the result of these operations is indeed undefined, according to
the C standard.
However, I don't know if your fix is correct ... the other interpretation is:
foo(data, data + 1);
++data;
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 4/30/14, 11:00 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
The 1.7.17 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan
On 30 April 2014 22:00, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
The 1.7.17 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on May 7th so please
try and
Sorry about the reminder, but are there any objections to the patch or
could it be applied?
I have received no comments on it, but perhaps the Apache mail server
gremlins swallowed them.
6 maj 2014 kl. 23.52 skrev Mattias Engdegård:
Translators will need the subversion.pot file; it should
FWIW, this is the problem I am getting:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-04/0318.shtml
And here is apparently someone else that has seen it as this includes a
patch:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-08/0069.shtml
Mark
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:48:37AM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu May 15 10:48:37 2014
New Revision: 1594860
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1594860
Log:
Introduce FSFS expert tool 'svnfsfs'. It is intended to grow various
FSFS-specific commands in the future -
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 5/13/14, 12:43 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
First, thanks a lot for taking a look and giving a plausible
explanation. It's a possibility, but I'm not fully convinced yet :-).
Pro:
- It fits theoretically (the one bit off etc).
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Andreas Stieger andreas.stie...@gmx.dewrote:
Hello,
I found a compiler warning in trunk on a potentially undefined operation
when using an increment operator on a variable referenced in the same
expression. This is on gcc 4.3.4, does not happen in gcc 4.7 and
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 07:26:20AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:35:50AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
James McCoy wrote on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 22:00:55 -0400:
I had tried the below patch but ran into some other issues that I didn't
have the time/experience to
16 maj 2014 kl. 19.24 skrev Andreas Stieger:
I think he has. Further, the call is to svn__base36toui64() which,
if I read correctly, uses the pointer as a return, e.g. in this case
it does not matter whether the first parameter was incremented.
Never versions of gcc might detect this and
Hi Daniel. It looks like your change this morning created this warning:
subversion/svn/propget-cmd.c:373:36: format '%ld' expects argument of type
'long int', but argument 5 has type 'svn_opt_revision_t'
- Julian
20 matches
Mail list logo
