Great to hear. I agree - it's a fairly wide topic. Nothing to jump on quickly.
As an aside, I wanted to augment my original response which had an
omission of a reference.
> Lets consider the five main work flows:
> - reviewing a patch submission;
> - reviewing a (typically recent) commit;
> -
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Jacek Materna wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 01:04:01AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> How do other ASF projects do this actually? Forums, presence in other
>>>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:48:28PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 15.03.2017 01:30, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > If the -M option sees something that does not look like a number,
> > we get a NULL cache but this isn't handled properly.
> >
> > svnadmin verify should probably errror out which is
On 15.03.2017 01:30, Stefan Sperling wrote:
If the -M option sees something that does not look like a number,
we get a NULL cache but this isn't handled properly.
svnadmin verify should probably errror out which is easy to fix.
But this may suggest there is a problem somewhere inside the
4 matches
Mail list logo