Re: beta@ feedback mailing list?

2017-05-15 Thread Jacek Materna
Great to hear. I agree - it's a fairly wide topic. Nothing to jump on quickly. As an aside, I wanted to augment my original response which had an omission of a reference. > Lets consider the five main work flows: > - reviewing a patch submission; > - reviewing a (typically recent) commit; > -

Re: beta@ feedback mailing list?

2017-05-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Jacek Materna wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 01:04:01AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> How do other ASF projects do this actually? Forums, presence in other >>>

Re: bug in svnadmin verify -M argument processing

2017-05-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:48:28PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On 15.03.2017 01:30, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > If the -M option sees something that does not look like a number, > > we get a NULL cache but this isn't handled properly. > > > > svnadmin verify should probably errror out which is

Re: bug in svnadmin verify -M argument processing

2017-05-15 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 15.03.2017 01:30, Stefan Sperling wrote: If the -M option sees something that does not look like a number, we get a NULL cache but this isn't handled properly. svnadmin verify should probably errror out which is easy to fix. But this may suggest there is a problem somewhere inside the