Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:04 +0100: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > > Johan Corveleyn wrote: > >> Just thinking out loud here ... > > > > [...]> H > > > > Now you're over-thinking it. What you said first, what you use at work,

Re: svn commit: r1817146 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.6.zh.html

2017-12-04 Thread Stefan
On 05/12/2017 02:38, luke1...@apache.org wrote: > Author: luke1410 > Date: Tue Dec 5 01:38:11 2017 > New Revision: 1817146 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1817146=rev > Log: > * site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.6.zh.html: Prefix broken links with > "XXX (dead link)" so we at least

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> [...] >> Hm, yes, I agree with the "don't write the same thing twice". But >> perhaps the "general description" above the list of affected files >> would be a better place: > > [...] >> >>

Re: svn commit: r1816926 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.part.html

2017-12-04 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan wrote: Giving some more details about this particular commit: On 01/12/2017 23:55, luke1...@apache.org wrote: Author: luke1410 Date: Fri Dec 1 22:55:51 2017 New Revision: 1816926 URL:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1816926=rev Log: *

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Julian Foad
Johan Corveleyn wrote: [...] Hm, yes, I agree with the "don't write the same thing twice". But perhaps the "general description" above the list of affected files would be a better place: [...] Though, indeed, we're not required to always have a "general description", and can just start with

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote: >> >> Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> >>> The intention is that the RM doesn't need to go through all the full >>> log messages in detail, but that he can trust the output of >>> write-changelog,

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan Sperling wrote: Johan Corveleyn wrote: The intention is that the RM doesn't need to go through all the full log messages in detail, but that he can trust the output of write-changelog, combined with trust in the quality of the log messages involved. OK, in that light it all makes sense

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:17:59PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > I believe that whatever we do, somebody will still have to read the full log > > and check each entry in CHANGES to avoid listing a lot of trivial stuff, > > and to make sure the most impactful changes appear at the top. > > I

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Examples: >> [U:major] Better interactive conflict resolution for tree conflicts >> [U:minor] ra_serf: Adjustments for serf versions with HTTP/2

Re: Subversion 1.10 RC1?

2017-12-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:51:26PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Work on 'svn ls --search' has been completed now, > release notes and friends have been updated. > > -- Stefan^2. Thank you!

Re: [PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Examples: > [U:major] Better interactive conflict resolution for tree conflicts > [U:minor] ra_serf: Adjustments for serf versions with HTTP/2 support > [U:client] Fix 'svn diff URL@REV WC' wrongly looks up URL@HEAD (issue

Re: Ideas for tracking Authz changes in a repo

2017-12-04 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 29.11.2017 18:40, Paul Hammant wrote: Thanks for this Marc. I'll go ahead and play with it to learn it capabilities and (hopefully few) snags. In 1.10 and for svn:// since 1.9, in-repository authz can be a lot faster than file-based authz. The reason is that repositories provide O(1)

Re: Subversion 1.10 RC1?

2017-12-04 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 22.11.2017 14:21, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On 22.11.2017 11:53, Julian Foad wrote: At the hackathon today we (me, Stefan Hett, Bert, Johan) have been talking about how to progress 1.10. We think all the features and changes are safe to release and are not going to get more testing until

[PATCH] release.py: write-changelog function (POC)

2017-12-04 Thread Johan Corveleyn
As promised on IRC last Friday, here is a POC implementation of the "generate changelog from commit messages" functionality, added to release.py (I'm not very experienced in Python; I mainly depend on google, SO, copy-paste, ... so don't focus on coding style etc). This patch is intended to