Re: svn commit: r1818496 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.10.html

2017-12-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan wrote on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:34 +0100: > On 17/12/2017 23:12, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > > >> This language implies that we made a backwards incompatible change in 1.6, > >> which is not precisely the case; 1.6 simply started enforcing an API > >> requirement that 1.

Re: svn commit: r1818496 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.10.html

2017-12-17 Thread Stefan
On 17/12/2017 23:12, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > >> This language implies that we made a backwards incompatible change in 1.6, >> which is not precisely the case; 1.6 simply started enforcing an API >> requirement that 1.5 did not. >> >> Could we perhaps rephrase this accordingl

Re: svn commit: r1818496 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.10.html

2017-12-17 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Daniel Shahaf writes: > This language implies that we made a backwards incompatible change in 1.6, > which is not precisely the case; 1.6 simply started enforcing an API > requirement that 1.5 did not. > > Could we perhaps rephrase this accordingly? I.e., point out that we weren't > inventing a

Re: svn commit: r1818496 - /subversion/site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.10.html

2017-12-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
kot...@apache.org wrote on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 17:19 +: > +++ subversion/site/staging/docs/release-notes/1.10.html Sun Dec 17 17:19:23 > 2017 > @@ -692,6 +692,25 @@ or power loss, e.g. when loading a dump > + > +New --normalize-props option for svnadmin load > + + title="Link to this sectio

Re: svn commit: r1807836 - in /subversion/trunk: subversion/include/ subversion/include/private/ subversion/libsvn_repos/ subversion/svnadmin/ subversion/svnrdump/ subversion/tests/cmdline/ subversion

2017-12-17 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Johan Corveleyn writes: > Hi Evgeny, > > I just mentioned this upcoming --normalize-props feature in a users > thread (and included a link to your commit). I noticed that it's not > mentioned in the release notes of 1.10 yet. Do you have time to write > a small release notes entry for it? Thanks