Re: svn commit: r1827100 - /subversion/branches/1.10.x/STATUS

On 17.03.2018 20:24, br...@apache.org wrote: > > + * r1825979 > + Minor clarification to docstring. > + Justification: > + Trivial documentation fix. > + Votes: > + +1: danielsh, jamessan > + -1: brane (the docstring "clarification" is wrong, since > +we do not

Re: svnadmin load error with 1.10 that seems to be fsfs cache related

On 17.03.2018 13:57, Philip Martin wrote: > Julian Foad writes: > >> But does that mean this code isn't being tested by any of our manual >> or buildbot testing in the last 6 months? > Yes, I think so. > > For svnserve the code only gets enabled when svnserve has block-read

Re: svnadmin load error with 1.10 that seems to be fsfs cache related

Julian Foad writes: > But does that mean this code isn't being tested by any of our manual > or buildbot testing in the last 6 months? Yes, I think so. For svnserve the code only gets enabled when svnserve has block-read enabled and svnserveautocheck doesn't do that. By

Re: [PATCH] Hackathon project: Dumping viewspec

On 16.03.2018 18:33, Julian Foad wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Julian Foad wrote: >>> We need to look at using the viewspec as input next. Semantically >>> speaking, >>> these sorts of things: >>> >>> * a way to check out a new WC to match the spec; >>> * a way to modify an existing WC to