Re: svn commit: r1891237 - in /subversion/site/staging/docs: ./ api/ api/1.13/ api/1.13/search/ api/1.14/ api/1.14/search/ javahl/ javahl/1.13/ javahl/1.13/org/ javahl/1.13/org/apache/ javahl/1.13/org

2021-07-05 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:27 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 23:45:01 +0200: > > It seems that the API and JavaHL docs for 1.13 and 1.14 are missing. I > have > > generated them from the branches. > > Are there any relevant differences between the branches

Re: SVN-4877 FSFS commit failure should release txn proto-rev lock

2021-07-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:23 +00:00: > Julian Foad wrote on Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:32:24 +0100: > > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Julian Foad wrote on Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 14:27:30 +0100: > > There could be two angles to view this issue. One angle is looking at > > the specifics of

Re: Web site link cleanup

2021-07-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 00:05:49 +0200: > Den sön 27 juni 2021 kl 23:36 skrev Daniel Shahaf: > > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 23:14:20 +0200: > > > Den sön 27 juni 2021 kl 20:34 skrev Daniel Shahaf: > > > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sat, 26 Jun 2021 21:12

Re: svn commit: r1891237 - in /subversion/site/staging/docs: ./ api/ api/1.13/ api/1.13/search/ api/1.14/ api/1.14/search/ javahl/ javahl/1.13/ javahl/1.13/org/ javahl/1.13/org/apache/ javahl/1.13/org

2021-07-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 23:45:01 +0200: > It seems that the API and JavaHL docs for 1.13 and 1.14 are missing. I have > generated them from the branches. Are there any relevant differences between the branches (@HEAD) and the latest tags on each branch?

Re: SVN-4877 FSFS commit failure should release txn proto-rev lock

2021-07-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:32:24 +0100: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Julian Foad wrote on Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 14:27:30 +0100: > There could be two angles to view this issue. One angle is looking at > the specifics of why WD's replicator wants different behaviour, which > I will go