Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

On 07 Mar 2022, Mark Phippard wrote: I do understand the reasons why Evgeny thought pre-fetching pristines for modified files as part of an 'update' could be a good idea. My recollection of the first version of this patch, commit needed the pristine and so had to fetch it before the commit hap

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 11:19 PM Karl Fogel wrote: [snipped] Agree with everything you have said. > I do understand the reasons why Evgeny thought pre-fetching > pristines for modified files as part of an 'update' could be a > good idea. My recollection of the first version of this patch, commi

Re: Subversion's test fails on aarch64, ppc64 and ppc64le

Hello everyone, On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 10:13 -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 5:38 AM Joe Orton wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:28:51PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 03:47:23PM +, Danilo Spinella wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am