assertion failed (status != svn_wc__db_status_normal)

2013-08-27 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew (Secure information solutions)
Hi. I have this error today - first one I've ever seen with SVN! I was simply running update on a repo I checked out a while back (less than 2 months), it's not had too many updates applied to it since then, so it's not a massively used repo. I'm running the latest TortoiseSVN (1.8.1) so I

RE: Subversion Session.

2011-08-10 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
The one thing I can think of that is a must tell is the sparse checkout feature - none of the DVCSs have this, and it's a pretty damn useful part of the whole. There's the OSS training from Polarion: http://www.polarion.com/products/svn/subtrain.php SubTrain is licensed under the Creative

Offline Commits (WAS: It's time to fix Subversion Merge)

2011-07-12 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Andy Singleton [mailto:a...@assembla.com] Sent: 11 July 2011 21:55 To: Bob Archer Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: It's time to fix Subversion Merge If you want offline commit and private repositories, you can use git or mercurial. We use

RE: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software?

2011-07-01 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:pe...@p12n.org] Sent: 30 June 2011 23:58 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional backup software? [Hyrum K Wright] I like this idea, but it would seem to

RE: Static code analysis (cppcheck)

2011-06-30 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] Sent: 29 June 2011 17:39 To: Julian Foad Cc: Philipp Kloke; Hyrum K Wright; dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Static code analysis (cppcheck) Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com writes:

RE: Case-only renames on Windows (issue #3702)

2011-03-25 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej Sent: 24 March 2011 15:32 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Case-only renames on Windows (issue #3702) [snip] In short, things aren't /that/ tricky as far as renames go. They're a lot

RE: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3799 - exporting file should not overwrite

2011-02-28 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] Sent: 25 February 2011 15:33 To: Noorul Islam K M Cc: Subversion Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3799 - exporting file should not overwrite On Sat, 2011-02-19, Noorul Islam K M wrote: I think it is this

RE: [Feature] New feature about handling 'HTTP Error 302 Movedtemporarily'?

2011-01-31 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: 28 January 2011 19:03 To: Bolstridge, Andrew Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: [Feature] New feature about handling 'HTTP Error 302 Movedtemporarily'? Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on Fri, Jan 28

RE: [Feature] New feature about handling 'HTTP Error 302 Moved temporarily'?

2011-01-28 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
On 01/27/2011 08:27 PM, Wu Di wrote: I found path in subversion sometimes too long, it's hard to be sent by Email and something else. And 'Tiny URL' is more popular now. it redirect a short URL to a long one. I thing is a good idea if TortoiseSvn could handle 'HTTP Error 302 Moved

RE: Windows svnsync test suite failures and a clue

2011-01-07 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 December 2010 22:56 To: Subversion Development Subject: Re: Windows svnsync test suite failures and a clue [snip] Being somewhat incredulous that this was the problem, I reinstalled WLE2011 and sure enough

RE: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people at the ApacheCon meetup)

2010-11-22 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net] Sent: 09 November 2010 16:42 To: Hyrum K. Wright Cc: Bolstridge, Andrew; Subversion Development Subject: Re: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people at the ApacheCon meetup) On 11/09

RE: Translation help

2010-11-16 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of Hyrum K. Wright Sent: 15 November 2010 18:17 To: Subversion Development Subject: Translation help To any current and/or interested translators: In an effort to make translation of

RE: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people at the ApacheCon meetup)

2010-11-08 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of Hyrum K. Wright Sent: 07 November 2010 02:34 To: Subversion Development Subject: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people at the ApacheCon meetup) [snip] My question: do

RE: object-model: Return by value, reference or pointer? (or something else?)

2010-10-14 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Steinar Bang [mailto:s...@dod.no] Sent: 13 October 2010 21:16 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: object-model: Return by value, reference or pointer? (or something else?) Do you need the distrinction between an empty string and a NULL? If not then

RE: place of svnrdump

2010-09-28 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Ramkumar Ramachandra [mailto:artag...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 September 2010 19:58 To: Neels J Hofmeyr Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Daniel Shahaf; Stefan Sperling Subject: Re: place of svnrdump Neels J Hofmeyr writes: While we're at it... svnsync's slowness is

RE: Pascal bindings

2010-09-03 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7:47 PM To: Philip Martin Cc: dmitry boyarintsev; dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Pascal bindings On 09/02/2010 01:38 PM, Philip Martin wrote: dmitry boyarintsev

RE: Bikeshed: configuration override order

2010-08-11 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:25 PM To: C. Michael Pilato Cc: Bolstridge, Andrew; Subversion Development Subject: Re: Bikeshed: configuration override order [snip] Oh? All I know about Andrew's

RE: Bikeshed: configuration override order

2010-08-10 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
Summary... There are two issues here... 1. The repo admin wants to enforce what is commited to their repo. This exists with scripts but common request can be made inherient repo settings (probably need to be path based). The issue with pre-commit hooks is that they are run after all

RE: Suggestion: Transparent Branching

2010-07-29 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 10:05 AM To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Suggestion: Transparent Branching On 07.07.2010 18:29, Greg Hudson wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:44 -0400, Marco Jansen wrote: So

RE: [PATCH] new feature, lazy sync via export --skipfilesmatchingsize

2010-07-26 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 3:34 PM To: svnusert...@href.com Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] new feature, lazy sync via export -- skipfilesmatchingsize [snip] I don't know if there is interest

RE: Suggestion: Transparent Branching

2010-07-08 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Marco Jansen [mailto:sart...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:44 PM To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Suggestion: Transparent Branching Greetings, The issue we have is that we use trunk as a stable version, but with ongoing maintenance.

RE: Problem building Serf on Windows

2010-07-05 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 5:13 PM To: Subversion Development Subject: Problem building Serf on Windows I am setting up a new Windows build machine. I am building our 1.6.12 release and deps zip. I get a problem

RE: auto-upgrade of working copy

2010-07-01 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Alan Barrett [mailto:a...@cequrux.com] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 8:26 AM To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: auto-upgrade of working copy [snip] The auto-upgrade has always bothered me. I'd much prefer to have a command line action (e.g. svn

RE: First SVN performance data

2010-05-13 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:08 PM To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: First SVN performance data Hi there, as I promised, I'm going to conduct some in-depth analysis and comprehensive SVN

RE: [PATCH] Saving a few cycles, part 2/2

2010-05-05 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of Hyrum K. Wright Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:55 PM To: Peter Samuelson Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Saving a few cycles, part 2/2 ... I would agree. I saw the

RE: Feature idea: user-configurable post-commit notifications

2010-04-28 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: Mon 26/04/2010 19:27 To: Bolstridge, Andrew Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Feature idea: user-configurable post-commit notifications Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on Fri, 23 Apr 2010 at 13:52 +0100

RE: Pushmi support

2010-04-12 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of Hyrum K. Wright Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:58 PM To: Stefan Sperling Cc: Philip Martin; Tim Starling; Greg Stein; Subversion Development Subject: Re: Pushmi support The last thing I

RE: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal

2010-04-09 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Vadim Chekan [mailto:kot.bege...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:14 AM To: Subversion Development Subject: Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal P.S. Plase, introduce true tags, no more lets pretend this copy is a tag. I agree here -

RE: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal

2010-04-09 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
ROADMAP With that vision in mind, we identified a number of high-value improvements which Subversion should gain in coming releases. Then we took a casual pass at assigning some technical plumbing dependencies for each of these. Here's what we came up with, in the form FEATURE: [DEPENDENCY