On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Just one more thing: as I mentioned in my rather long mail, blame
>> would benefit the most from my optimization if the server were fast
>> enough. So if anyone could spar
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> ...
>
> Just one more thing: as I mentioned in my rather long mail, blame
> would benefit the most from my optimization if the server were fast
> enough. So if anyone could spare some review cycles (ok, I know they
> are scarce these days),
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, 8 Oct 2010 at 01:44 -:
>> With suffix-lines-to-keep=50, you'd need to insert a
>> block of text that has its last 50 lines identical to the 50 lines
>> preceding the insertion point, to mess up the diff result
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up to the WIP-patches I posted last week [1], which
> are about improving performance of svn_diff (and therefor also blame
> on the client-side), especially for large files.
>
> To summarize: the idea was (is) to
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, 8 Oct 2010 at 01:44 -:
> With suffix-lines-to-keep=50, you'd need to insert a
> block of text that has its last 50 lines identical to the 50 lines
> preceding the insertion point, to mess up the diff result.
>
> - If really necessary, we could say default=50, but
Hi all,
This is a follow-up to the WIP-patches I posted last week [1], which
are about improving performance of svn_diff (and therefor also blame
on the client-side), especially for large files.
To summarize: the idea was (is) to strip off the identical prefix and
suffix, and then letting the exi
6 matches
Mail list logo
