On 2023-09-22 12:25, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:50 AM Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN) via dev
mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org>> wrote:
Guys,
I'd like to understand what your current planning is. According to "How
We Plan Releases" [1] Subversion 1.10.x should have
On 2023-09-22 13:03, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
Den fre 22 sep. 2023 kl 12:25 skrev Nathan Hartman
mailto:hartman.nat...@gmail.com>>:
I guess [2] is an inconsistency with the site, since 1.10.x doesn't
have more updates planned and 1.10.8 was the final release in that
line. The
Den fre 22 sep. 2023 kl 12:25 skrev Nathan Hartman :
> I guess [2] is an inconsistency with the site, since 1.10.x doesn't have
> more updates planned and 1.10.8 was the final release in that line. The
> inconsistency likely exists because we used to support two LTS lines in a
> staggered manner.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:50 AM Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN) via dev <
dev@subversion.apache.org> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to understand what your current planning is. According to "How
> We Plan Releases" [1] Subversion 1.10.x should have been long gone, but
> [2] says otherwise.
> What is your
On 2023-09-22 12:05, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
Den fre 22 sep. 2023 kl 11:50 skrev Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN) via dev
mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org>>:
Guys,
I'd like to understand what your current planning is. According to "How
We Plan Releases" [1] Subversion 1.10.x should have
Den fre 22 sep. 2023 kl 11:50 skrev Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN) via dev <
dev@subversion.apache.org>:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to understand what your current planning is. According to "How
> We Plan Releases" [1] Subversion 1.10.x should have been long gone, but
> [2] says otherwise.
> What is your
Guys,
I'd like to understand what your current planning is. According to "How
We Plan Releases" [1] Subversion 1.10.x should have been long gone, but
[2] says otherwise.
What is your way forward, do you plan 1.15.x, 1.14.x will obsolete
1.10.x finally?
Let me know what you think.
Regards,
7 matches
Mail list logo
