-Original Message-
From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of
Hyrum K. Wright
Sent: maandag 20 december 2010 19:32
To: Subversion Development
Subject: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)
We got two sigs for each of Windows
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:43 +, Julian Foad wrote:
1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. [...]
I had some trouble building this but have now got the main tests
... working.
I have not been able to run any of the bindings tests. Details at
http://pastebin.com/z9k8Qp62 or on
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:01 +, Julian Foad wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:43 +, Julian Foad wrote:
1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. [...]
I had some trouble building this but have now got the main tests
... working.
I have not been able to run any of the
We got two sigs for each of Windows and Unix for 1.5.9, but the
signing process has stalled from there. I'd still like to release
this, if possible, but we should probably make a decision at some
point.
-Hyrum
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:31:55PM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
We got two sigs for each of Windows and Unix for 1.5.9, but the
signing process has stalled from there. I'd still like to release
this, if possible, but we should probably make a decision at some
point.
I have run tests but
Summary:
+1 to release.
Platform:
Linux (Debian/stable).
Verified:
signatures, MD5 checksums, SHA1 checksums
only expected difference compared to tags/1.5.9
Tested:
1.5.9 tarball with local dependencies (not deps tarball)
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon, javahl) x (fsfs,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is
r1041577:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/
To sign the release, please input your signatures using the script here:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran kam...@collab.net wrote:
Forgive my ignorance Paul. IIUC in 1.5.x we can only have neon or serf not
both. Did you do 2 builds to test this?
I think you are confusing it with 1.4.x. We added support in 1.5.x
for supporting both:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran kam...@collab.net
wrote:
Forgive my ignorance Paul. IIUC in 1.5.x we can only have neon or serf not
both. Did you do 2 builds to test this?
I think you are confusing
On 12/03/2010 09:04 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandrankam...@collab.net wrote:
Forgive my ignorance Paul. IIUC in 1.5.x we can only have neon or serf not
both. Did you do 2 builds to test this?
I think you are confusing it with 1.4.x. We added
1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is r1041577:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/
To sign the release, please input your signatures using the script here:
http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py
(The script worked pretty well for 1.6.15, but
On 12/02/2010 04:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is
r1041577:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/
Summary:
+1 to release.
Platform:
Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) Linux.
Tested:
1.5.9 tarball with local dependencies
12 matches
Mail list logo
