Hehe... reminds me of my short fight against SVN_ERR hiding a return
statement, way back when...
On Apr 20, 2010 11:46 AM, "Hyrum K. Wright"
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Julian Foad
wrote:
>
> Daniel Shahaf wr...
While an interesting exercise in extending the C language, I've got
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 11:49 +0100:
> > > Hmm... I wonder if we could do something with a macro that takes the
> > > whole block of code to be executed as an argument, like:
> >
> > A code block insid
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 11:49 +0100:
> > Hmm... I wonder if we could do something with a macro that takes the
> > whole block of code to be executed as an argument, like:
>
> A code block inside a macro call??
Well, I tried it and it works and I kind of li
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 11:49 +0100:
> Hmm... I wonder if we could do something with a macro that takes the
> whole block of code to be executed as an argument, like:
>
A code block inside a macro call?? Perhaps we write a macro in the
style of SVN_DBG --- one that is "pseudo-va
On Mon, 2010-04-19, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:03, wrote:
> > * subversion/libsvn_client/commit.c
> > (post_process_commit_item): Eliminate a misleadingly named local variable.
>
> The best way to clarify what is happening is to remove the use of
> svn_iter_apr_array().
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
