Re: Aw: Status of ctypes-python bindings

2015-02-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13.02.2015 13:30, Julian Foad wrote: > Andreas Stieger wrote: >> Branko Čibej wrote: >>> I've been looking at the ctypes-based Python bindings. They're barely >>> maintained; the only changes in the last two years seem to have been >>> minor tweaks to make the tests run. I'm also not aware of an

Re: Aw: Status of ctypes-python bindings

2015-02-13 Thread Julian Foad
Andreas Stieger wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: >> I've been looking at the ctypes-based Python bindings. They're barely >> maintained; the only changes in the last two years seem to have been >> minor tweaks to make the tests run. I'm also not aware of anyone using >> them, or any packager bundling t

Aw: Status of ctypes-python bindings

2015-02-13 Thread Andreas Stieger
Hi, Branko Čibej wrote: > I've been looking at the ctypes-based Python bindings. They're barely > maintained; the only changes in the last two years seem to have been > minor tweaks to make the tests run. I'm also not aware of anyone using > them, or any packager bundling them. > > This was an in