Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes:
Is the op-depth stuff ready for release?
The only other big ticket item to be tackled is the conflict store, right?
Currently op-depth is using just two depths, 0 and 2, for base and
working. There is code protected by SVN_WC__OP_DEPTH that enables the
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:40:31AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes:
Is the op-depth stuff ready for release?
The only other big ticket item to be tackled is the conflict store, right?
Currently op-depth is using just two depths, 0 and 2, for base and
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes:
Thanks for the info. Are the items in the issue tracker corresponding
to the above two points?
I don't know if we have issues. We have regression tests for
revert-base that are failing and currently marked XFAIL.
--
Philip
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:40:31AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de writes:
Is the op-depth stuff ready for release?
The only other big ticket item to be tackled is the conflict store, right?
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:11:24PM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
As some of you know, on Thursday night we had a Subversion meetup in
conjunction with ApacheCon. The meetup wasn't too well attended (a
separate mail on that will be forthcoming), but Greg and I did have
some discussions about
As some of you know, on Thursday night we had a Subversion meetup in
conjunction with ApacheCon. The meetup wasn't too well attended (a
separate mail on that will be forthcoming), but Greg and I did have
some discussions about wc-ng and 1.7.x and branch date possibilities.
After reviewing the
On 06.11.2010 19:11, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
As some of you know, on Thursday night we had a Subversion meetup in
conjunction with ApacheCon. The meetup wasn't too well attended (a
separate mail on that will be forthcoming), but Greg and I did have
some discussions about wc-ng and 1.7.x and
7 matches
Mail list logo
