Re: Copies via update -- net win or net loss? (Was: svn commit: r996914 ...)

2010-09-17 Thread C. Michael Pilato
At this point, I'm not even really asking for permission any more. If somebody doesn't beat me to it, I'll gut the feature myself after I wrap up some other things that hold my attention right now. Tracking this work in issue #3711. -- C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net CollabNet

Re: Copies via update -- net win or net loss? (Was: svn commit: r996914 ...)

2010-09-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:58:20 -0400: On 09/14/2010 10:25 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: Author: rhuijben Date: Tue Sep 14 14:25:52 2010 New Revision: 996914 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996914view=rev Log: When mixing the two major hacks of the

Re: Copies via update -- net win or net loss? (Was: svn commit: r996914 ...)

2010-09-15 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/15/2010 12:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:58:20 -0400: On 09/14/2010 10:25 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: Author: rhuijben Date: Tue Sep 14 14:25:52 2010 New Revision: 996914 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996914view=rev Log:

Copies via update -- net win or net loss? (Was: svn commit: r996914 ...)

2010-09-14 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/14/2010 10:25 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: Author: rhuijben Date: Tue Sep 14 14:25:52 2010 New Revision: 996914 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996914view=rev Log: When mixing the two major hacks of the update editor (copy_from location and file externals), we can get into

Re: Copies via update -- net win or net loss? (Was: svn commit: r996914 ...)

2010-09-14 Thread Julian Foad
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:58 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 09/14/2010 10:25 AM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: Author: rhuijben Date: Tue Sep 14 14:25:52 2010 New Revision: 996914 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996914view=rev Log: When mixing the two major hacks of the