Branko Čibej wrote:
Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
However, it seems there is more general question, "What versions
do we support on Python 3?" [...]
To be honest, I wouldn't care about any Python 3 older than 3.5 [...]
Let's move this to a new email thread. I'll open one. Subject: "What
On 01.11.2019 09:58, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> On 2019/11/01 14:23, Nathan Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:22 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> Running the build scripts and tests with Python3 works now on trunk,
>>> with the latest fixes. Except for this warning:
>>>
>>>
On 2019/11/01 14:23, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:22 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
Running the build scripts and tests with Python3 works now on trunk,
with the latest fixes. Except for this warning:
.../run_tests.py:53: DeprecationWarning: the imp module is deprecated in
favour
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:22 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> Running the build scripts and tests with Python3 works now on trunk,
> with the latest fixes. Except for this warning:
>
> .../run_tests.py:53: DeprecationWarning: the imp module is deprecated in
> favour of importlib; see the module's
On 19.10.2019 23:06, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.10.2019 19:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 19.10.2019 11:45, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
>>> On 2019/10/18 8:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote
On 19.10.2019 19:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.10.2019 11:45, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
>> On 2019/10/18 8:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
>>
On 19.10.2019 11:45, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> On 2019/10/18 8:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>
On 2019/10/18 8:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
On 16.10.2019
On 18.10.2019 01:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
>>> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
>> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
> >> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the build and
> >>> test
On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
>> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the build and
>>> test process under Python 3. Any committer can edit the buildbot
>>>
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the build and
> > test process under Python 3. Any committer can edit the buildbot
> > scripts[1], but the question is which of the
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:03 PM Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:30 PM Julian Foad wrote:
> > Close buttons are at top of page when logged in.
>
> Nope. I am logged in. I have a feeling my account isn't setup
> correctly with permissions. I might have to bother infra... :-(
Close buttons are at top of page when logged in.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:44 AM Julian Foad wrote:
> Looks good to me.
Thanks! Regression test added in r1868561.
Now, here's a dumb question...
How do I close the issue?! There doesn't seem to be a button for it.
Nathan Hartman wrote:
Test below. Please review...
Looks good to me.
- Julian
Test below. Please review...
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:18 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> Is it possible, through some incantation that I've overlooked, to run
> >> the cmdline tests against an arbitrary svn binary?
> make check SVN_BIN_DIR=/opt/foo/some/path
>
> See Makefile.in, line 617.
Btw,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:18 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.10.2019 13:55, Julian Foad wrote:
> >> Is it possible, through some incantation that I've overlooked, to run
> >> the cmdline tests against an arbitrary svn binary?
> >
> > Unfortunately that's something we never got around to. I would
On 17.10.2019 13:55, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Is it possible, through some incantation that I've overlooked, to run
>> the cmdline tests against an arbitrary svn binary?
>
> Unfortunately that's something we never got around to. I would love
> to make that possible.
???
make check
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:46 AM Julian Foad wrote:
> Of course, ideally, it is lovely to improve the test coverage, if you
> have spare time and spare enthusiasm, or can do so really quickly so it
> doesn't impact other activities. However, it's not required and not
> necessarily worth it. A
On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the build and
> test process under Python 3. Any committer can edit the buildbot
> scripts[1], but the question is which of the buildbot slaves has Python 3
> installed?
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:47 +00:00:
Is it sensible to add a regression test?
Yes, unless other tests already cover this.
Of course, ideally, it is lovely to improve the test coverage, if you
have spare time and spare enthusiasm, or can do so really
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:47 +00:00:
> Is it sensible to add a regression test?
Yes, unless other tests already cover this.
Such tests would probably be either in diff_tests.py or in
subversion/tests/libsvn_diff/.
In general, Python tests may be tagged with «@Issue(1722)»
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:40 AM Julian Foad wrote:
> Your analysis is good enough for me. I don't need to double check the details.
>
> I'd say, add a short summary and a link to that email, and close it.
Will do...
FWIW I tested the SVN-1722 reproduction script on 1.13.0-rc1 earlier
today and
Nathan,
Your analysis is good enough for me. I don't need to double check the details.
I'd say, add a short summary and a link to that email, and close it.
- Julian
A short time ago, in a galaxy nearby... or, in the thread
"Fwd: PMCs: any Hackathon requests? (deadline 11 October)"...
Julian Foad wrote:
>> Nathan Hartman wrote:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-1722 "svn
>> diff may missreport a revision as the working copy."
>
> Errm... last
28 matches
Mail list logo
