Re: Issue triage: issues 3429 and 3474

2010-11-17 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:25:24 +0100: >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin >> wrote: >> > Johan Corveleyn writes: >> > >> >> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these >> >> issu

Re: Issue triage: issues 3429 and 3474

2010-11-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:25:24 +0100: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin > wrote: > > Johan Corveleyn writes: > > > >> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these > >> issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed

Re: Issue triage: issues 3429 and 3474

2010-11-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Johan Corveleyn writes: > >> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these >> issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed), >> after which they can be marked as fixed. > > Yes, please.  Are there

Re: Issue triage: issues 3429 and 3474

2010-11-08 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: > Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these > issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed), > after which they can be marked as fixed. Yes, please. Are there any existing XFAIL tests that apply? They sometimes don't XPA

Issue triage: issues 3429 and 3474

2010-11-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi, I recently verified that the following two issues are fixed on trunk: - #3429: "svn mv A B; svn mv B A" generates replace without history - #3474: making a new subdir, moving files into it and then renaming the subdir, breaks history of the moved files Should I mark these as fixed in the is