On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:25:24 +0100:
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn writes:
>> >
>> >> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these
>> >> issu
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:25:24 +0100:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn writes:
> >
> >> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these
> >> issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these
>> issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed),
>> after which they can be marked as fixed.
>
> Yes, please. Are there
Johan Corveleyn writes:
> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these
> issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed),
> after which they can be marked as fixed.
Yes, please. Are there any existing XFAIL tests that apply? They
sometimes don't XPA
Hi,
I recently verified that the following two issues are fixed on trunk:
- #3429: "svn mv A B; svn mv B A" generates replace without history
- #3474: making a new subdir, moving files into it and then renaming
the subdir, breaks history of the moved files
Should I mark these as fixed in the is
5 matches
Mail list logo