Re: Next stable releases

2018-07-13 Thread Julian Foad
Julian Foad wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > In the meantime, we can document the authz regression on > > https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.10#issues [...] > > Yes. I can do that now. http://svn.apache.org/r1835812 - Julian

Re: Next stable releases

2018-07-13 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: > In the meantime, we can document the authz regression on > https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.10#issues so it's > easily visible to those considering to upgrade from 1.9.x to 1.10.1. Yes. I can do that now. - Julian

Re: Next stable releases

2018-07-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:35 +0100: > Philip Martin wrote: > > [...] a user recently reported another regression > > [...] I'd like to delay 1.10.1 for a few days [...] > > My time is currently allocated to rolling a release of the good fixes we > already have. In a few days I will

Re: Next stable releases

2018-07-12 Thread Julian Foad
Philip Martin wrote: > [...] a user recently reported another regression > [...] I'd like to delay 1.10.1 for a few days [...] My time is currently allocated to rolling a release of the good fixes we already have. In a few days I will be busy with something else, then going on vacation, and befo

Re: Next stable releases

2018-07-12 Thread Philip Martin
Julian Foad writes: > Julian Foad wrote: >> Philip Martin wrote on 2018-06-05: >> > It's time to consider 1.9.8 and 1.10.1. >> >> I can prepare these releases. Please nominate/review/vote on backports. > > I plan to roll these releases on Thursday. One of the reasons for 1.10.1 was to fix the a

Re: Next stable releases

2018-07-09 Thread Julian Foad
Julian Foad wrote: > Philip Martin wrote on 2018-06-05: > > It's time to consider 1.9.8 and 1.10.1. > > I can prepare these releases. Please nominate/review/vote on backports. I plan to roll these releases on Thursday. - Julian

Re: Next stable releases

2018-06-29 Thread Julian Foad
Philip Martin wrote on 2018-06-05: > It's time to consider 1.9.8 and 1.10.1. I can prepare these releases. Please nominate/review/vote on backports. - Julian > 1.9.7 has issue 4722, the spurious SHA1 checksum fail during commit: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SVN/issues/SVN-4722 >

Next stable releases

2018-06-05 Thread Philip Martin
It's time to consider 1.9.8 and 1.10.1. 1.9.7 has issue 4722, the spurious SHA1 checksum fail during commit: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SVN/issues/SVN-4722 This has been reported more than once on users and is a regression from earlier 1.9.x. 1.10.0 has issue 4741, an authz group c