On Oct 28, 2011 3:44 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>...
> Anyway: we're looping, since I already made that point and I already
> understand what problem you were trying to fix.
"Looping"?
How polite.
I prefer the term "in violent agreement". But maybe that's just me :-)
'Daniel Shahaf' writes:
>Yes. And I'm saying that we already have the correct URL elsewhere
>in the code.
>
>Anyway: we're looping, since I already made that point and I already
>understand what problem you were trying to fix. Why don't you just fix
>it, one way or the other? Neither of us want
Karl Fogel wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 15:30:53 -0400:
> 'Daniel Shahaf' writes:
> > './get-deps.sh sqlite' works for me, right now.
>
> When you run configure, if it can't find the right SQLite it prints out
> a message with a URL where you can fetch it. Last night, when I did
> this, that me
'Daniel Shahaf' writes:
> './get-deps.sh sqlite' works for me, right now.
When you run configure, if it can't find the right SQLite it prints out
a message with a URL where you can fetch it. Last night, when I did
this, that message was wrong -- the URL it pointed to didn't exist.
That was what
Karl Fogel wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 13:24:33 -0400:
> "Bert Huijben" writes:
> >> Given the fine granularity of the version numbers, it seems likely that
> >> Richard Hipp updates the "latest amalgamation" zipfile fairly often. We
> >> could ask him to keep the old versions in place, but tha
"Bert Huijben" writes:
>> Given the fine granularity of the version numbers, it seems likely that
>> Richard Hipp updates the "latest amalgamation" zipfile fairly often. We
>> could ask him to keep the old versions in place, but that seems like a
>> lot of trouble to go through, given that the la
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Karl Fogel
> Sent: vrijdag 28 oktober 2011 18:16
> To: Daniel Shahaf
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update to SQLite amalgamation instructions.
> Given the fi
"Daniel Shahaf" writes:
>We could construct the URL as currently valid and also link to the
>download page. That way people can click the first link and also have
>the second if the first breaks.
But the version-specific URL is going to be invalidated so quickly that
most of the time (probably,
On Friday, October 28, 2011 11:35 AM, "Karl Fogel" wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> >Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:19:37 +0200:
> >> Karl Fogel wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:28:43 -0400:
> >> > It's been a while, so out of caution I'd appreciate review on this
> >> > before
Daniel Shahaf writes:
>Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:19:37 +0200:
>> Karl Fogel wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:28:43 -0400:
>> > It's been a while, so out of caution I'd appreciate review on this
>> > before I commit, even though it's a fairly trivial patch. Thanks!
>> >
>>
>
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:19:37 +0200:
> Karl Fogel wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:28:43 -0400:
> > It's been a while, so out of caution I'd appreciate review on this
> > before I commit, even though it's a fairly trivial patch. Thanks!
> >
>
> Why did you drop the direct
Karl Fogel wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:28:43 -0400:
> It's been a while, so out of caution I'd appreciate review on this
> before I commit, even though it's a fairly trivial patch. Thanks!
>
Why did you drop the direct link to the .tgz? The log message doesn't
say, and I know that elsewher
12 matches
Mail list logo
