Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:41, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
For example,
$ svn cp A/B C
$ svn revert C/D/file
That should error.
$ svn revert C
Should succeed, and undo
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Greg and Peter,
Thanks for your views on this topic. A few comments/questions below.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:54, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
We have several issues related to the question of how revert should
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:41, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
For example,
$ svn cp A/B C
$ svn revert C/D/file
That should error.
$ svn revert C
Should succeed, and undo the copy that was made.
Since we
We have several issues related to the question of how revert should
handle locally added or copied items:
'svn revert of svn move'
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=876
'svn revert should provide a way to delete copied files'
[Paul Burba]
With only one exception that I know of[1], revert leaves local
additions of every stripe as unversioned. My first question is
simple:
Do we consider this the correct behavior?
A) Yes! svn revert only reverts the scheduled addition, but leaves
the item behind as
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:54, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
We have several issues related to the question of how revert should
handle locally added or copied items:
'svn revert of svn move'
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=876
'svn revert should provide a way to
6 matches
Mail list logo
