On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:20 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, 01 May 2020 18:26 +00:00:
>
> > Since we reached the 6 month mark for 1.13 yesterday, that means its
> > support will continue until 1.14 is released at which point it is EOL.
>
> Can we dig down on this point a
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, 01 May 2020 18:26 +00:00:
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:17 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > I'm not asking for special treatment or for changing the policy. I'm
> > asking to clarify the policy for the general case of the period of time
> > immediately following a 1.(x+1).0
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:17 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, 01 May 2020 11:49 -0400:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:47 PM Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> >
> > > danie...@apache.org wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21 -:
> > > > +++
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, 01 May 2020 11:49 -0400:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:47 PM Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>
> > danie...@apache.org wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21 -:
> > > +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.14.html Thu Apr 30
> > 16:21:48 2020
> > > @@ -1330,6
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:47 PM Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> danie...@apache.org wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21 -:
> > +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.14.html Thu Apr 30
> 16:21:48 2020
> > @@ -1330,6 +1330,20 @@ if they occur.
> > +
> > +Subversion 1.13.x is end of life
> > +
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:47 PM Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> danie...@apache.org wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21 -:
>
I just copied the text we use for 1.9, but there's a distinction: users
> of 1.9 have had time to upgrade to 1.10 before 1.14.0 becomes GA,
> whereas users of 1.13 have not. So,
6 matches
Mail list logo
