On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 23:03:24 +0200:
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:51:28PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> > Good to know. Is it worth to rename it to `svn diff --git` for
>> > unification with Mercurial?
>>
>> I
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 23:03:24 +0200:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:51:28PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > Good to know. Is it worth to rename it to `svn diff --git` for
> > unification with Mercurial?
>
> I suppose we could rename the option to "--git", yes.
> Do you w
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:51:28PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Good to know. Is it worth to rename it to `svn diff --git` for
> unification with Mercurial?
I suppose we could rename the option to "--git", yes.
Do you want to send a patch that does so?
See http://subversion.apache.org/docs/co
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:44:50PM +0100, Jon Foster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a --git-diff option in Subversion Trunk, so this will
> probably be available in Subversion 1.7.
Yes. But there are some restrictions, most notably with renames.
Our git-style diffs show adds, deletes, and copies prope
Good to know. Is it worth to rename it to `svn diff --git` for
unification with Mercurial?
Please, CC.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Jon Foster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a --git-diff option in Subversion Trunk, so this will
> probably be available in Subversion 1.7.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jon
Hi,
There is a --git-diff option in Subversion Trunk, so this will
probably be available in Subversion 1.7.
Kind regards,
Jon
-Original Message-
From: anatoly techtonik [mailto:techto...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 August 2010 17:35
To: Subversion Development
Subject: git diff format support
6 matches
Mail list logo