On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:23:28PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
BTW, those who complain that no one's working on ra_serf hasn't looked
at the diffs between 1.6.x and trunk. New authn framework, digest
auth, Kerberos auth, error handling fixes, better proxy support,
HTTPv2 support, etc.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:55:10AM -0700, Bert Huijben wrote:
From: Stefan Sperling
- Conflict storage
Do we really need to have this ready for 1.7? We might as well keep
using the 1.6-style of recording conflict information in temporary
files, that act as conflict markers. At the
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: zaterdag 21 augustus 2010 3:32
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit?
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:55:10AM -0700, Bert Huijben wrote:
From: Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] On Behalf Of Bert Huijben
Sent: zaterdag 21 augustus 2010 9:18
To: 'Stefan Sperling'
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Reduce the 1.7 release feature set a bit?
Doesn't this require the new conflict store
I think that the recent NODE_DATA developments in wc-ng show that wc-ng
is still in flux, or at least a bit further from stabilisation than we'd
like it to be. That's fine! I'd much rather see us release a great working
copy library than get the release out 3 months earlier. Our new focus on
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
just me): http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3684
Lieven fixed this in serf trunk a few months back. IOW, I can
reproduce with serf 0.6.1, but not serf trunk.
Greg/Lieven: shall we cut a new release? Greg
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Lieven Govaerts
lieven.govae...@gmail.com wrote:
The memory usage problem is probably still there. Last time I looked
at it with valgrind (at the elego days), most of the memory
7 matches
Mail list logo
