Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad wrote: Can anyone volunteer to review this important block-read fix? (adding to CC: some people who might) Thanks for your review, stefan2! We now need one more review. - Julian Philip Martin wrote: Julian Foad writes: How do you feel about the amount of test coverage we

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Can anyone volunteer to review this important block-read fix? (adding to CC: some people who might) - Julian Philip Martin wrote: Julian Foad writes: How do you feel about the amount of test coverage we are giving this block-read code so far -- is it sufficient for a 1.10.0 release? And

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad writes: > How do you feel about the amount of test coverage we are giving this > block-read code so far -- is it sufficient for a 1.10.0 release? And > should I roll RC2 ASAP or not? The block-read fix in STATUS still needs approval. As well as running the

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad wrote: Philip Martin wrote: Julian Foad writes: AFAIK we still need to arrange adequate test coverage for it. Test coverage is provided by the other nominations in STATUS.  Apply r1827105, r1827114 and run "make davautocheck BLOCK_READ=1" and see lots of

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Philip Martin wrote: Julian Foad writes: AFAIK we still need to arrange adequate test coverage for it. Test coverage is provided by the other nominations in STATUS. Apply r1827105, r1827114 and run "make davautocheck BLOCK_READ=1" and see lots of tests FAIL. Apply

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad writes: > AFAIK we still need to arrange adequate test coverage for it. Test coverage is provided by the other nominations in STATUS. Apply r1827105, r1827114 and run "make davautocheck BLOCK_READ=1" and see lots of tests FAIL. Apply the 4725 fix and they

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad wrote: I plan to roll 1.10.0-rc2 this week so we can release it by next Wednesday (3 weeks from RC1). Update: That plan is delayed by "svnadmin load error fsfs cache" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4725 "FSFS cache reading one svndiff window beyond end"

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:00:57 +0100: > C:\>python tools\dist\release.py write-changelog > --include-unlabeled-summaries branches/1.10.x tags/1.10.0-rc1 > * Merge r1825045 from trunk: (r1825285) > * Merge r1825215 from trunk: (r1825286) > * Merge r1825306 from

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad writes: > Please review the 'STATUS' file and report here if there's anything else I > should take into account. I have found a bug (my fault) in the new svn_txdelta_to_svndiff_stream() API that can result in failing commits over http://. Should be fixed by

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 14.03.2018 08:58, Julian Foad wrote: > ... >>> If anyone's willing to write a brief list of the changes since RC1, to >>> include in the RC2

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 14.03.2018 08:58, Julian Foad wrote: ... >> If anyone's willing to write a brief list of the changes since RC1, to >> include in the RC2 announcement, that would be an added bonus. > > svn log -v STATUS | grep svn-role.

Re: Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

On 14.03.2018 08:58, Julian Foad wrote: > Julian Foad wrote on 2018-02-28: >> I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.10.0-rc1. > > That was 2 weeks ago and we need an RC2. > > I plan to roll 1.10.0-rc2 this week so we can release it by next > Wednesday (3 weeks from RC1). > >

Rolling 1.10.0-rc2

Julian Foad wrote on 2018-02-28: I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.10.0-rc1. That was 2 weeks ago and we need an RC2. I plan to roll 1.10.0-rc2 this week so we can release it by next Wednesday (3 weeks from RC1). Please review the 'STATUS' file and report here if