Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> Originally, I wanted to complete the get_list API before the alpha
>> release but I can't make any commitments. So, it is probably better
>> to roll the alpha with whatever is on /trunk at
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 24.01.2017 12:20, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
>> I would like to get an 1.10.0 alpha1 released in February. Unless I hear
>> objections I will start rolling this alpha release from trunk and call a
>> vote on it
On 24.01.2017 12:20, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Hi,
Another update on the new conflict resolver:
We have 36 conflict resolver tests, all of which PASS.
I have updated the wiki page about conflict tests accordingly:
https://wiki.apache.org/subversion/TreeConflictTests
The 36 tests we have still do
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:37:30 +0100:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 07:06:29PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 19:06:13 +0100:
> > That's just a synchronization problem and is easily solved. I'm more
> > concerned that we'd need to
On 1/25/2017 11:37 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 07:06:29PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 19:06:13 +0100:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:52:39PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
[...]
If we do this, it would be good to know upfront
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 07:06:29PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 19:06:13 +0100:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:52:39PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > I wonder if we should delay the release announcement until we can link
> > > to a bunch of
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:41:47PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another update on the new conflict resolver:
> >
> > We have 36 conflict resolver tests, all of which PASS.
> > I have updated the wiki page
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another update on the new conflict resolver:
>
> We have 36 conflict resolver tests, all of which PASS.
> I have updated the wiki page about conflict tests accordingly:
>
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 19:06:13 +0100:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:52:39PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > I wonder if we should delay the release announcement until we can link
> > to a bunch of .deb/.rpm/GUIs/* from it. This way, once we do announce@,
> > we can hope for
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:52:39PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 18:45:37 +0100:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:08:51PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > - Asking downstreams (distros) to make alpha1 packages easily available
> > > to opting-in users
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 18:45:37 +0100:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:08:51PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > - Asking downstreams (distros) to make alpha1 packages easily available to
> > opting-in users
>
> Yes we can do that. But this is often ineffective because distros
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:08:51PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:20:39 +0100:
> > I would like to get an 1.10.0 alpha1 released in February. Unless I hear
> > objections I will start rolling this alpha release from trunk and call a
> > vote on it
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:20:39 +0100:
> I would like to get an 1.10.0 alpha1 released in February. Unless I hear
> objections I will start rolling this alpha release from trunk and call a
> vote on it soon.
That all sounds good.
However, last time we did that we had
Hi,
Another update on the new conflict resolver:
We have 36 conflict resolver tests, all of which PASS.
I have updated the wiki page about conflict tests accordingly:
https://wiki.apache.org/subversion/TreeConflictTests
The 36 tests we have still do not cover much of the overall problem space.
14 matches
Mail list logo