On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann <
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "s
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> > and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "split up
> >
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "split up
> fs_fs.c" part of it.
>
> If there are no objections, I will merge
emory,
which then ends up as long lived.
We should slowly move to dual pools for every function with long lived
output arguments.
Bert
--
From: Stefan Fuhrmann
Sent: 12/08/2013 00:39
To: Philip Martin
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: fsfs-improvements b
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> > and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "split up
> >
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "split up
> fs_fs.c" part of it.
>
> If there are no objections, I will merge
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> >
> >> Thanks for spotting & fixing this!
> >> The extra "_" was a recent addition to make output match /trunk.
> >
> > Another difference: db/txn-current produced by the branch does not
Philip Martin writes:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
>> Thanks for spotting & fixing this!
>> The extra "_" was a recent addition to make output match /trunk.
>
> Another difference: db/txn-current produced by the branch does not have
> a trailing \n. It works, but it might be better if it was th
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> Thanks for spotting & fixing this!
> The extra "_" was a recent addition to make output match /trunk.
Another difference: db/txn-current produced by the branch does not have
a trailing \n. It works, but it might be better if it was the same as
trunk.
--
Philip Marti
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > The branch uniquifiers aren't unique. I see the branch code writing
> > different uniqifiers into the transaction files but _0 values appear in
> > the revision file.
>
> The code in svn_fs_fs__parse_representati
Philip Martin writes:
> The branch uniquifiers aren't unique. I see the branch code writing
> different uniqifiers into the transaction files but _0 values appear in
> the revision file.
The code in svn_fs_fs__parse_representation doesn't seem to parse the
uniqifier properly:
(gdb) p string
$6
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "split up
> fs_fs.c" part of it.
>
> If there are no objections, I will merge
Hi all,
After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "split up
fs_fs.c" part of it.
If there are no objections, I will merge the code in the week of Aug
13 matches
Mail list logo
