Re: migration to NODES

2010-09-28 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:25, Julian Foad wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-09-24, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Julian Foad wrote: >>> >... >>> > I think we should produce a test framework that can give us a WC >>> > containing a

Re: migration to NODES

2010-09-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I'd rather have O(1) hand-crafted wc's than all 950 wc's the test suite generates, of which likely 99% are 'normal'... (especially as it's the end-of-run state, after any conflicts have been resolved etc) Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 05:47:36 -0400: > I took the 1.6.x branch and ran th

Re: migration to NODES

2010-09-28 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:25, Julian Foad wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-24, Greg Stein wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Julian Foad wrote: >> >... >> > I think we should produce a test framework that can give us a WC >> > containing all the different possible WC states.  Then we can write >>

Re: migration to NODES

2010-09-27 Thread Julian Foad
On Fri, 2010-09-24, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Julian Foad wrote: > >... > > I think we should produce a test framework that can give us a WC > > containing all the different possible WC states. Then we can write > > tests against this framework, some tests that test speci

Re: migration to NODES

2010-09-24 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Julian Foad wrote: >... > I think we should produce a test framework that can give us a WC > containing all the different possible WC states.  Then we can write > tests against this framework, some tests that test specific state, and > other tests that apply the same

Re: migration to NODES

2010-09-24 Thread Julian Foad
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 01:40 -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > Hey all, > > So I've been thinking of how we upgrade working copies to the new > NODES table. As before, we have two scenarios to be concerned with: > > 1. formats 4..10: releases 1.0 thru 1.6 > 2. formats 11..19: 1.7-dev > > For (1), we rev

migration to NODES

2010-09-23 Thread Greg Stein
Hey all, So I've been thinking of how we upgrade working copies to the new NODES table. As before, we have two scenarios to be concerned with: 1. formats 4..10: releases 1.0 thru 1.6 2. formats 11..19: 1.7-dev For (1), we revamp the old-entries-writing in entries.c, which is invoked as part of u