Stefan Sperling wrote:
This time it has compiled, but does not work.
svn list svn://admin/test/ works OK (IMHO because the ANONYMOUS
mechanism is sufficient for that) but svn co svn://admin/test/
dumps core immediately.
I hope I have found the problem. Does the patch below work
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:33:28PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
This time it has compiled, but does not work.
svn list svn://admin/test/ works OK (IMHO because the ANONYMOUS
mechanism is sufficient for that) but svn co svn://admin/test/
dumps core immediately.
Hi Victor,
I hope I have
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am
sorry, I
am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
ability does not go beyond scripting.
Can you try this patch and let me know if it works?
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
ability does not go beyond scripting.
Can you try this patch and let me know if it works?
Please try this one
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 01:08:52PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
am a systems
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
ability does not go beyond scripting.
Can you try this patch and let me know if it works?
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
ability does not go beyond
users.
However it seems that there is a stalemate situation.
According to Daniel Shahaf, the subversion client uses the
server-reported mechanisms, in the order suggested by the server.
There is no knob that lets you manipulate the order in the client.
Please see the thread sasl mechanisms
CC += dev@
Victor Sudakov wrote on Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:53:44 +0700:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I have the following line in /usr/local/lib/sasl2/svn.conf:
mech_list: gssapi digest-md5 anonymous
How can I guarantee that the subversion client/server will always use
GSSAPI before
9 matches
Mail list logo