Ivan,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Philip Martin
> [...]
>
>> Also, there might well be a windows-kerberos triple trusted
>> domain .. setup somewhere where svn+neon works and
> From: Philip Martin
> kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes:
>
> > *one* of my servers currently logs around 10GB per week with neon
> > only access. I'd probably have to change from rotating logs
> > weekly to rotating logs hourly! Disabling logging is not an option.
>
> It depends what sort o
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes:
> *one* of my servers currently logs around 10GB per week with neon
> only access. I'd probably have to change from rotating logs
> weekly to rotating logs hourly! Disabling logging is not an option.
It depends what sort of access patterns you see. The probl
On 13.11.2012 21:03, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
here. Without any KeepAlive, t
On 13.11.2012 20:48, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request on
every connection nee
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>> We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
>>> here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
>> We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
>> here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request on
>> every connection needed to be re-authenticated. With
On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request on
every connection needed to be re-authenticated. With KeepAlive on and
the connection limit set high enough then it w
> Greg Stein writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> > wrote:
> >>...
> >> Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> >> increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than
older
> >> servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, bu
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> We at WANdisco had a discussion about serf in 1.8 today; I'd said I
> summarise to the list.
>
> One concern is the impact on server performance, particularly older
> servers, of serf as the only client. Issue
> http:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz writes:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>
>>> Is that a fix that we can get in apache 2.2? Justin?
>>>
>>
>> I don't readily recall the issue in mod_deflate. Is it already resolved in
>> the
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>
>> Is that a fix that we can get in apache 2.2? Justin?
>>
>
> I don't readily recall the issue in mod_deflate. Is it already resolved in
> the 2.4 series?
r1103315
You wrote about it:
http://mail-archives.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Is that a fix that we can get in apache 2.2? Justin?
>
I don't readily recall the issue in mod_deflate. Is it already resolved in
the 2.4 series?
> work. These concern maybe only 1% of the users, but we should have a
> plan to support
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Philip Martin
[...]
> Also, there might well be a windows-kerberos triple trusted
> domain .. setup somewhere where svn+neon works and svn+serf doesn't
> work.
What is "windows-kerberos tripli trusted dom
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> We at WANdisco had a discussion about serf in 1.8 today; I'd said I
> summarise to the list.
>
> One concern is the impact on server performance, particularly older
> servers, of serf as the only c
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 00:02:07 -0500:
> On Nov 12, 2012 10:50 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >
> > Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 21:48:23 -0500:
> > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Philip Martin
> > > wrote:
> > > > Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > > >
> > > >> Greg Stein
On Nov 12, 2012 10:50 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 21:48:23 -0500:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Philip Martin
> > wrote:
> > > Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > >
> > >> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
> > >>>
> > >>> In October
Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 21:48:23 -0500:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > Daniel Shahaf writes:
> >
> >> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
> >>>
> >>> In October, svn.apache.org generated about 900M of logs(*). Is that a
> >>> pr
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
>> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
>>>
>>> In October, svn.apache.org generated about 900M of logs(*). Is that a
>>> problem? I wouldn't think so. At that rate, a simple 1T drive could
>>> hol
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> I have a checkout of the gcc tree, it has 78,000 files. Now it uses
> svn: but if it were to use http: then the serf checkout log would be 4
> orders of magnitude bigger than the neon log. 83 years becomes 1 or 2
> days.
>
> The neon log is
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
>>
>> In October, svn.apache.org generated about 900M of logs(*). Is that a
>> problem? I wouldn't think so. At that rate, a simple 1T drive could
>> hold over 83 years of logs. Are there installations busier than
>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> > wrote:
> > >...
> > > Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> > > increase in the number of requests
Greg Stein writes:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>...
>> Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
>> increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than older
>> servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, but there is still
Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> >...
> > Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> > increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than older
> > servers, about 50% fewer r
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
>...
> Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than older
> servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, but there is still a big
> increase over neon.
We at WANdisco had a discussion about serf in 1.8 today; I'd said I
summarise to the list.
One concern is the impact on server performance, particularly older
servers, of serf as the only client. Issue
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3980 has some
figures. The CPU loa
26 matches
Mail list logo
