On 15.09.2010 21:03, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about
a decade old, and C99 is just as
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
where the benefits are desirable? When
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:58:10PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
@@ -524,9 +524,11 @@ parse_property_block(svn_stream_t *strea
else if ((buf[0] == 'D') (buf[1] == ' '))
{
char *keybuf;
+ apr_int64_t len;
+ SVN_ERR(svn_cstring_atoi64(len,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:02:52PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 10.09.2010 15:26, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I know we're using C89, but maybe it's time to move on and upgrade to C99
where the benefits are desirable? When Subversion was started, C89 was about
a decade old, and C99 is just as
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:47:39PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: vrijdag 10 september 2010 15:26
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r995475 -
/subversion/trunk
-Original Message-
From: s...@apache.org [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 17:52
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r995475 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c
Author: stsp
Date: Thu Sep 9 15:51:34 2010
New Revision
7 matches
Mail list logo
