Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:53:16 +0200:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:42:09AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Which of the two methods described in step 1 do you have in mind?
Non-POSIX, for context diffs.
Rephrased to apply to svn patch:
svn patch will examine the
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:21:31AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Fewest path components, shortest basename, total filename length.
It's predictable, but it seems a bit arbitrary?
It does seem a bit arbitrary, but I was able to rationalise it as
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:42:09AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Which of the two methods described in step 1 do you have in mind?
Non-POSIX, for context diffs.
Rephrased to apply to svn patch:
svn patch will examine the ``old'' and ``new'' file names,
and choose the file name with the
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 21:40:16 +0200:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:18:26 +0200:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Right. The issue seems to be How do I
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:18:26 +0200:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Right. The issue seems to be How do I determine what path I should
apply the patch to? If the patch style is
--- wc/file
+++ wc/file
or
--- old_wc/file
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:18:26 +0200:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Right. The issue seems to be How do I determine what path I should
apply the patch to? If the patch
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
Right. The issue seems to be How do I determine what path I should
apply the patch to? If the patch style is
--- wc/file
+++ wc/file
or
--- old_wc/file
+++ new_wc/file
then you're going to be stripping the first
On Mon, 2010-09-13, s...@apache.org wrote:
* subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c
(svn_diff_parse_next_patch): When generating a reverse diff, do not swap
the old and new filenames of the patch. The old filename in a unidiff
is often useless (e.g. it contains a .orig extension), but the
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:50:05PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13, s...@apache.org wrote:
* subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c
(svn_diff_parse_next_patch): When generating a reverse diff, do not swap
the old and new filenames of the patch. The old filename in a unidiff
9 matches
Mail list logo