On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
On
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 13:08 +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
Hi Vijay,
vijayaguru wrote:
The attached patch adds a test case for issue #3471:svn up touches file
w/ lock svn:keywords property and marking it as 'XFail' until the
issue is fixed.
Thanks for the patch. I reviewed it and I
CC += dev@, and let me point you to our patch submission guidelines:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#patches
Summary for dev@: allow svnsync to translate non-UTF-8 log messages to UTF-8.
(more below)
Daniel Trebbien wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 18:58:06 -0700:
vijayaguru wrote:
Thanks senthil. The attached patch tests the timestamp changes before
and after svn up and raises failure if they are not same.
[[[
Log:
Add a test for issue #3471:'svn up touches file w/ lock
svn:keywords property'
* subversion/tests/cmdline/update_tests.py
s...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:31:13 -:
+ return svn_error_return(
+ svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT, NULL,
+_(Malformed representation header)));
svn_error_return() isn't necessary here, since svn_error_create()
has always
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:20:17PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:31:13 -:
+ return svn_error_return(
+ svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT, NULL,
+_(Malformed representation header)));
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 14:27:23 +0200:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:20:17PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:31:13 -:
+ return svn_error_return(
+ svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT, NULL,
+
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:39:04PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
It might be good to make the rule 'return svn_error_*();' never needs
svn_error_return() wrapper and fix the svn_error_* functions/macros
that don't already record the file/line.
+1
-Original Message-
From: style...@apache.org [mailto:style...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 13:47
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r995388 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/update_tests.py
Author: stylesen
Date: Thu Sep 9
vijayaguru vi...@collab.net writes:
+#--
+# Test for issue #3471 'svn up touches file w/ lock svn:keywords property'
+#
+# Marked as XFail until that issue is fixed.
+def
Daniel Trebbien wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:48:43 -0700:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Daniel Trebbien wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 18:58:06 -0700:
+ if (strcmp(propname, svn:log) == 0)
+ {
Should this use
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Sep 9 15:59:00 2010
New Revision: 995478
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995478view=rev
Log:
On the performance branch:
Bring up-to-date with trunk.
...
Modified:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
CC += dev@, and let me point you to our patch submission guidelines:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#patches
Summary for dev@: allow svnsync to translate non-UTF-8 log messages to UTF-8.
What do we expect 'svn merge --accept=base' to do when encountering
text conflicts?
While checking up on an old open issue
(http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3514) I was
surprised to find that base doesn't refer to the base of the merge
target, but rather the base of the merge
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 02:05, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
...
The solution I'm looking at now is to undo r1388, and solve the
crashes in another way.
Serf trunk 1408 solves this issue for me and for Paul.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:27 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Aug 12 23:27:40 2010
New Revision: 985037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985037view=rev
Log:
The second (and probably last) mass change: svn_stringbuf_appendbytes has
a relatively large runtime
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 13:33, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 02:05, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
...
The solution I'm looking at now is to undo r1388, and solve the
crashes
-Original Message-
From: s...@apache.org [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 9 september 2010 17:52
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r995475 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c
Author: stsp
Date: Thu Sep 9 15:51:34 2010
New Revision:
Morning Stefan,
Per IRC today, I've run 'make davautocheck' while subjected to 5% packet loss
(via iptables -A INPUT -i lo -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8088 \
-m statistic --mode random --probability 0.05 -j DROP),
and while using a patch (attached) to run 'svnadmin setrevprop'
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 22:46:16 +0300:
and while using a patch (attached) to run 'svnadmin setrevprop'
concurrently to the tests.
Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/testcase.py
===
---
I've went ahead and added the atomic-revprop branch to the buildbot's
watched branches. (Apparently I missed some ra_serf breakage on the
branch, and I can't run the 4-way tests every time.) If anyone has an
issue with this change, please let me know.
This was implemented last hour by gmcdonald
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
I've went ahead and added the atomic-revprop branch to the buildbot's
watched branches. (Apparently I missed some ra_serf breakage on the
branch, and I can't run the 4-way tests every time.) If anyone has an
issue
Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 16:09:53 -0500:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
I've went ahead and added the atomic-revprop branch to the buildbot's
watched branches. (Apparently I missed some ra_serf breakage on the
branch, and I
Hyrum Wright wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Sep 9 15:59:00 2010
New Revision: 995478
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995478view=rev
Log:
On the performance branch:
Bring up-to-date with trunk.
...
Modified:
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hyrum Wright wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Sep 9 15:59:00 2010
New Revision: 995478
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995478view=rev
[ I'm only talking about the ra_serf tests in this email ]
When I build the atomic-revprop branch against serf r1408, I see that:
* diff_tests 24 29 (and many others [1]) fail with HEAD of the branch.
(IIRC these two failures persist if I switch to serf ^/branches/0@head.)
* diff_tests
Hi Everyone.
This renewed patch has received no comments.
Gavin Beau Baumanis
On 04/09/2010, at 10:25 PM, Wei-Yin Chen wrote:
Dear Gavin,
Thanks. The attachment was in my sent box, but it's absent in the mailing
archive. Don't know why.
Per Branko's suggestion, I'm using join this
Ping. This patch has received no comments.
Gavin Beau Baumanis
On 04/09/2010, at 11:43 PM, Wei-Yin Chen wrote:
Sorry, don't know why the attachment was removed again. Does this
mailing list have a strict Content-Type filter? I'm trying
text/x-patch this time from my linux box. Type
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
[ I'm only talking about the ra_serf tests in this email ]
When I build the atomic-revprop branch against serf r1408, I see that:
* diff_tests 24 29 (and many others [1]) fail with HEAD of the branch.
(IIRC
30 matches
Mail list logo
