Re: 1.6.23 up for signing/testing

2013-05-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > The 1.6.22 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion > and add your signatures there. We plan to try and release on May 30th > so please try and g

svn_error_create(SERF_ERROR_FOO, NULL, NULL);

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Just got a report of a problem with 1.8.0-rc2: svn: E120104: ra_serf: An error occurred during decompression The error code is unrecognised; that's because it's not an SVN_ERR_* code: % ./tools/dev/which-error.py E120104 00120104 *** UNKNOWN ERROR CODE *** % ./tools/dev/which-er

Re: Media-Type for SVNPubSub

2013-05-28 Thread Greg Stein
Hmm. Why would the media-type vary based on ${project} ? It seems like all you would need is application/vnd.apache.pubsub.json Is there a reason for something more than that? Cheers, -g On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > Right now the SVNPubSub server serves NUL separated JSO

Re: svn_error_create(SERF_ERROR_FOO, NULL, NULL);

2013-05-28 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > Just got a report of a problem with 1.8.0-rc2: > > svn: E120104: ra_serf: An error occurred during decompression > > The error code is unrecognised; that's because it's not an SVN_ERR_* code: > > % ./tools/dev/which-error.py E120104 > 00120104 *** UNKNOWN ERRO

Re: Windows Ruby changes

2013-05-28 Thread Paul Burba
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Paul, > > wrt the r1480344 group in STATUS: I think the 'rescue' block, here: > >ENV["PATH"].split(";").each do |path| > + > +# Change the cwd to path, but ignore non-existent paths. > +begin > +

Re: Media-Type for SVNPubSub

2013-05-28 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hmm. Why would the media-type vary based on ${project} ? > > It seems like all you would need is application/vnd.apache.pubsub.json > > Is there a reason for something more than that? The vendor tree media-types are somewhat undefined as far a

Re: Media-Type for SVNPubSub

2013-05-28 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> Hmm. Why would the media-type vary based on ${project} ? >> >> It seems like all you would need is application/vnd.apache.pubsub.json >> >> Is there a reason for something more than that? >

Berlin 2013 topics

2013-05-28 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Hi all, We had a list of items for discussion in 2011. I think it is a good idea to try the same thing in 2013. So, please add topics that you are interested in here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-13-agenda -- Stefan^2. -- *Join one of our free daily d

Re: Berlin 2013 topics

2013-05-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 29.05.2013 01:20, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Hi all, > > We had a list of items for discussion in 2011. I think it is a good > idea to try the same thing in 2013. So, please add topics that you > are interested in here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-13

Re: Berlin 2013 topics

2013-05-28 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 29.05.2013 01:20, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We had a list of items for discussion in 2011. I think it is a good > > idea to try the same thing in 2013. So, please add topics that you > > are interested in here: > > > > > h

Re: Berlin 2013 topics

2013-05-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 29.05.2013 01:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Branko Čibej > wrote: > > On 29.05.2013 01:20, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We had a list of items for discussion in 2011. I think it is a good > > idea to