-Original Message-
From: julianf...@apache.org [mailto:julianf...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 30 mei 2013 20:24
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1487954 -
/subversion/trunk/build/generator/gen_base.py
Author: julianfoad
Date: Thu May 30 18:24:24 2013
New
On 31.05.2013 06:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, May 30, 2013 at 22:40:11 +0200:
On 30.05.2013 21:59, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Running gen-make.py on trunk@1487954, I get the following warning at the
end:
[[[
WARNING: errno intersects APR error codes: set([1, 10004,
On 05/30/2013 06:20 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
To actually release on that date you would still need to follow Mike's
proposed schedule. It would just allow more time for the final signing. But
it would still have to happen
One of my colleagues at WANdisco asked some questions about using
freeze. The first thing he wanted to know is how to detect whether a
freeze is running. There are various approaches: look at running
processes, look at processes with the lock file open, implement some
external lock, etc. but
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:35:57PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
I think something like that would work but I'm unsure whether we should
provide it. I'm concerned that it would be making freeze special.
Would we need to provide similar queries for upgrade, recover, pack,
etc?
For what it's
Bert Huijben wrote:
Author: julianfoad
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1487954
Log:
* build/generator/gen_base.py
(TargetLinked): Remove some redundant and wrong code.
(_collect_paths): Document what happens if the pattern is not found.
Modified:
On 31.05.2013 14:52, Julian Foad wrote:
Bert Huijben wrote:
Author: julianfoad
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1487954
Log:
* build/generator/gen_base.py
(TargetLinked): Remove some redundant and wrong code.
(_collect_paths): Document what happens if the pattern is not found.
Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org writes:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:35:57PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
I think something like that would work but I'm unsure whether we should
provide it. I'm concerned that it would be making freeze special.
Would we need to provide similar queries for
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, May 31, 2013 at 14:23:35 +0100:
Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org writes:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:35:57PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
I think something like that would work but I'm unsure whether we should
provide it. I'm concerned that it would be making
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, May 31, 2013 at 14:23:35 +0100:
Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org writes:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:35:57PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
I think something like that would work but I'm unsure whether we should
provide it. I'm concerned that
On 05/31/2013 10:35 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Just an opinion from general experience in the world of computers. With
any system where some resource is reserved (locked), it can be useful to
find out who/what has the lock. So, a system that tells me the repo is
currently locked by which of the
On 05/31/2013 11:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 05/31/2013 10:35 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Just an opinion from general experience in the world of computers. With
any system where some resource is reserved (locked), it can be useful to
find out who/what has the lock. So, a system that tells
On 31.05.2013 17:27, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 05/31/2013 11:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 05/31/2013 10:35 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Just an opinion from general experience in the world of computers. With
any system where some resource is reserved (locked), it can be useful to
find out
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 05/31/2013 10:35 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Just an opinion from general experience in the world of computers. With
any system where some resource is reserved (locked), it can be useful to
find out who/what has the lock. So, a system that tells me the repo is
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
That's OK for manual investigation, but we're looking for a solution that
suitable for building into infrastructure management scripts, so it needs to
be portable and reliable, and stable across OS upgrades and the
Philip:
How do I subscribe to the dev list? Not sure I really have time for
that... but perhaps.
Thank you.
Doug
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.comwrote:
Doug,
I started a thread on the dev list and meant to cc you but forgot.
Don't feel any
Hi,
it would be useful to announce the support policy 1.8 supported, 1.7
security supported, 1.6 not supported right on the index.html when 1.8
gets released.
Regards
Martin
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Doug Robinson
doug.robin...@wandisco.com wrote:
How do I subscribe to the dev list? Not sure I really have time for that...
but perhaps.
http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
Doug Robinson wrote:
Philip:
How do I subscribe to the dev list? Not sure I really have time for that...
but perhaps.
I'm not Philip but I can tell you. Google(subversion dev mailing list
subscribe)
- http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
- email
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4369
If I have broken locks the commit fails:
svnadmin create repo
svn -mm import repo/format file://`pwd`/repo/A/f
svn co http://localhost/obj/repo wc
svn lock wc/A/f
echo xx wc/A/f
svn lock --force file://`pwd`/repo/A/f
svn -mm ci wc
With
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:49:05PM +0200, Martin Bieder wrote:
Hi,
it would be useful to announce the support policy 1.8 supported, 1.7
security supported, 1.6 not supported right on the index.html when 1.8
gets released.
This information is already on the downloads page:
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes:
What sort of URI do we have to supply? Will a session relative f do?
Or a server relative /obj/repo/A/f? Or a full scheme/host/port/path?
RFC 2518 says:
9.4 If Header
If = If : ( 1*No-tag-list | 1*Tagged-list)
No-tag-list = List
On 05/31/2013 03:17 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
so how about this patch:
Index: subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/commit.c
===
--- subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/commit.c(revision 1488294)
+++ subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/commit.c
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.10.
Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting:
http://subversion.apache.org/download/#recommended-release
This release addresses three security issues:
CVE-2013-1968: fsfs repository corruption caused by newline
I'm happy to announce the release of Subversion 1.6.23. Please note
that Subversion 1.6.23 is the next release after Subversion 1.6.21.
The 1.6.22 release was not published publicly, due to issues found
during testing.
Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting:
25 matches
Mail list logo
