[[[
Add information about svn-dev IRC channel.
* community-guide/general.part.html:
(participating): Add IRC address and freenode webchat client.
]]]
Notes:
-pGo to a href=http://subversion.apache.org/;
-http://subversion.apache.org//a and/p
was removed with the reasoning that:
a) they
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:50:23 +0100:
[[[
Add information about svn-dev IRC channel.
* community-guide/general.part.html:
(participating): Add IRC address and freenode webchat client.
]]]
Notes:
-pGo to a href=http://subversion.apache.org/;
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation where the user makes a mistake, gets something they don't expect
and tries to interpret it based on their desire - leading to confusion. I
On 06/14/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation where the user makes a mistake, gets something they don't expect
and tries to interpret it based
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation where the user makes a mistake, gets something they don't expect
Prabhu wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 14:33:57 +0530:
On 06/14/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation where the user makes a mistake, gets
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:18:35 +0200:
Prabhu wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 14:33:57 +0530:
On 06/14/2013 02:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error)
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:16:06 +0200:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that simply enabling MN (where it is now an error) will create the
situation
Hi,
Considering Bens mails, and some personal discussions
yesterday, I refine variant 2, and drop variant 1 (which
actually was an extremely simplified subset of variant 2).
1) We define a bunch of test categories.
- The number of categories should be small and well-arranged. To much
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Would it suffice to change the header file conditions from
#if defined(DARWIN) || defined(DOXYGEN)
to
#if defined(DARWIN) || defined(DOXYGEN) || defined(SWIG)
Yes and I guess that's probably the easiest solution for
Ben Reser wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 14:09:29 +0200:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Would it suffice to change the header file conditions from
#if defined(DARWIN) || defined(DOXYGEN)
to
#if defined(DARWIN) || defined(DOXYGEN) ||
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
At the risk of jinxing the proposed June 18th release date for 1.8.0,
I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
These are cut from the same magic rev as
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:16:06 +0200:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Doug Robinson wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:10:49 -0400:
Daniel:
I think that
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
At the risk of jinxing the proposed June 18th release date for 1.8.0,
I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
These are cut from the same magic rev as
I would guess 1 and twi are actually the same problem: no node found
via peg revision.
Bert From: Johan Corveleyn
Sent: 14/06/2013 16:51
To: Daniel Shahaf
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge cases
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf
Bert Huijben wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:06:25 -0700:
I would guess 1 and twi are actually the same problem: no node found
via peg revision.
Bert From: Johan Corveleyn
Sent: 14/06/2013 16:51
To: Daniel Shahaf
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge
Svn_ra_get_deleted_rev() ?
(could have a typo)
Bert From: Daniel Shahaf
Sent: 14/06/2013 17:11
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge cases
Bert Huijben wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:06:25 -0700:
I would guess 1 and twi are
No typo, but that function doesn't help, since we don't have a revision
in which the file existed; the use-case is to do 'svn blame -r HEAD:0
file' and have the 0 become the first revision in which the file
existed.
It seem the fix is to use svn_client__repos_location_segments(), like
'log' does.
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 17:41:18 +0200:
No typo, but that function doesn't help, since we don't have a revision
in which the file existed; the use-case is to do 'svn blame -r HEAD:0
file' and have the 0 become the first revision in which the file
existed.
It seem the fix
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:00:37PM +0200, Ben Reser wrote:
At the risk of jinxing the proposed June 18th release date for 1.8.0,
I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
+1 to release.
I didn't run tests again for this
This is mostly directed at Branko but putting it on the dev list anyway.
This is the instructions for the bits you need to do:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#releasing-release
The most important thing to do is make sure to get the signed releases
move to release
SUMMARY:
+1 to release. Signature committed.
PLATFORM:
Windows 2008 Server
VS 2012 Update 2
Java 1.7
COMPONENTS:
Apache2.4.4
APR1.4.6
APR-UTIL1.5.1
OpenSSL 1.0.1e
Serf 1.2.1
ZLib 1.2.8
SQLite 3.7.16.2
VERIFIED:
signature
That function and the get revs function can only go from new to old.
That deleted rev is the only one for the other way From: Daniel Shahaf
Sent: 14/06/2013 17:41
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge cases
No typo, but that
Paul burba added and shortly after reverted (as no longer used) code to
separate these steps. You can probably revive that code.
Bert From: Daniel Shahaf
Sent: 14/06/2013 17:49
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge cases
Daniel
I'm working on a text to describe how these work, including two tables
detailing all possible combinations.
Lieven
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Before I forget, I just noticed that there is no mention anywhere in
the release notes about the
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
At the risk of jinxing the proposed June 18th release date for 1.8.0,
I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
These are cut from the same magic rev as
26 matches
Mail list logo
