Evgeny Kotkov wrote on Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 23:55:19 +0300:
> Stefan Sperling writes:
>
> >> 1) enabling it on trunk permanently (and disabling it on stable branches)
> >>
> >> 2) tagging a wc that has the patch applied
> >>
> >> 3) committing the patch to a branch and arrange for
Hi Kotkov,
On 2/16/2017 21:44, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Stefan Hett writes:
>
>> Committed in r1782893 with a slightly modified log message.
>> - loc = urlparse(req_url)
>> -
>> - if loc.scheme == 'http':
>> -h = httplib.HTTPConnection(loc.hostname, loc.port)
>> - else:
Evgeny:
Thank you.
Doug
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Evgeny Kotkov
wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > == Question ==
> >
> > WANdisco would like to know that there will not be differences in the
> > repository on-disk data due to
Julian Foad writes:
> == Question ==
>
> WANdisco would like to know that there will not be differences in the
> repository on-disk data due to differences in instance-id (other than the
> "db/uuid" itself, of course). I suggest we are talking about the lifetime of
> FSFS
Stefan Sperling writes:
>> 1) enabling it on trunk permanently (and disabling it on stable branches)
>>
>> 2) tagging a wc that has the patch applied
>>
>> 3) committing the patch to a branch and arrange for the tag to
>> incorporate the changes from that branch.
>
> 4) Encourage
Stefan Hett writes:
> Committed in r1782893 with a slightly modified log message.
> - loc = urlparse(req_url)
> -
> - if loc.scheme == 'http':
> -h = httplib.HTTPConnection(loc.hostname, loc.port)
> - else:
> -h = httplib.HTTPSConnection(loc.hostname, loc.port)
>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 02:47:48PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The patch is trivial (attached), so I think this really is about the
> mechanics of making the change; for example:
>
> 1) enabling it on trunk permanently (and disabling it on stable branches)
>
> 2) tagging a wc that has the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The 1.10.1-alpha1 release is finally up for signing.
>
> Full committers, please get this release from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thank you!
I just realized I did not
A couple of weeks ago we discussed enabling
verify_as_revision_before_current_plus_plus() in the alpha release.
Since that hasn't been done yet, the alpha is now tagged without that
change. (I do not fault him stsp that in the least; the onus was on
proponents of the change to make it happen.)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The 1.10.1-alpha1 release is finally up for signing.
Sorry about the above typo.
The subject line has the correct release number (1.10.0-alpha1).
The 1.10.1-alpha1 release is finally up for signing.
Full committers, please get this release from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there.
Thank you!
11 matches
Mail list logo