gpg-agent password prompt hangs since r1794166+r1795087

2018-09-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
When I run: . % ./subversion/svn/svn mkdir -qmm https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/test . it hangs with no output, until I «pkill pinentry» from another terminal, at which point I get the built-in password prompt. I bisected this to the gpg-agent changes in r1794166+r1795087 [1]: in r1794165

Re: SVN binaries: build linking process

2018-09-28 Thread Doug Robinson
Julian: Just one quick note: On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:42 AM Julian Foad wrote: > >> I used to have such a tool in a past environment. It was WONDERFUL. I > haven't seen hide nor hair of one for Linux... that would be ideal. > > >See the most-voted answer here: >

Re: svn commit: r1838813 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_fs/recovery.c tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py

2018-09-28 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: > julianf...@apache.org wrote on Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:48 +: > > Author: julianfoad > > Date: Fri Aug 24 10:48:37 2018 > > New Revision: 1838813 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838813=rev > > Log: > > Let 'svnadmin recover' prune the rep-cache even if it is

Re: How to get feedback on experimental features

2018-09-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:52 +0100: > Other ideas or starting points, anyone? Would it help to have a non-publicly-archived feedback channel? I'm thinking of, say, some feedback@subversion.a.o mailing list, privately archived and with moderated subscriptions. What do other ASF

Re: svn commit: r1838813 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_fs/recovery.c tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py

2018-09-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
julianf...@apache.org wrote on Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:48 +: > Author: julianfoad > Date: Fri Aug 24 10:48:37 2018 > New Revision: 1838813 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1838813=rev > Log: > Let 'svnadmin recover' prune the rep-cache even if it is disabled. > > Part of issue #4077:

How to get feedback on experimental features

2018-09-28 Thread Julian Foad
In the 1.11 release notes I wanted to write "We would like to hear your feedback on these experimental features. Please share your thoughts with us " ... What would make a good landing page for that link? More generally, how can we better handle getting feedback? Currently we have almost no

please review outstanding backports for 1.10.x

2018-09-28 Thread Stefan Sperling
Julian and myself would like to start preparing another 1.10.x release over the coming week, to be relased close to 1.11.0. There are 9 pending nominations in 1.10.x/STATUS currently, and 4 bug fixes have already been merged to the 1.10.x branch since 1.10.2. All these fixes would provide good

Subversion 1.11.0-rc2 up for testing/signing

2018-09-28 Thread Julian Foad
The 1.11.0-rc2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. Thanks! -- - Julian

Re: SVN binaries: build linking process

2018-09-28 Thread Julian Foad
Can anyone shed more light on Doug's question below. Basically, svn binaries being installed such that they find their libs at a fixed location that cannot be overridden by LD_LIBRARY_PATH; is there a particular reason why this is so? Doug Robinson wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >> Doug Robinson

Re: Ruby bindings failure, perhaps related to __?

2018-09-28 Thread Julian Foad
Branko Čibej wrote: > On 27.09.2018 19:02, Julian Foad wrote: > > [...] maybe it would be better to just not create the "XShelf" short name > > [...] > > > > But also I want to remember that the priority right now is to get 1.11 out > > with something that works, first, and then improve it