On 19.01.2019 22:24, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>>
>> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
>> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
>> an error and failing
On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
> an error and failing to allow the use of that AuthZ file.
>
>
Brane:
See below.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 15:12 Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> Hi Doug!
>
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
> file
On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Hi Doug!
>
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>>
>> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
>> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
>> an error
On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> This is about to change. :)
I added a test for this:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1851676
-- Brane
Hi Doug!
On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
> an error and failing to allow the use of that AuthZ file.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
