Re: Svn server images / appliances / packages

Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:07 +00:00: > But: The reference system would be one particular configuration known > to work, with all the kinks ironed out. Isn't that just cd subversion/tests/cmdline && ./davautocheck.sh --no-tests ?

Re: "svn list -v" column alignment issue

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:28 PM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2020-01-08 13:12:21 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:28:01 +0100: > > > On 2020-01-07 16:10:52 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 16:17:10

Re: 20th anniversary press?

Nathan: Let me see what we can do. Cheers. Doug On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:20 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:07 AM Doug Robinson > wrote: > >> Folks: >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 9:21 AM Nathan Hartman >> wrote: >> >>> It's super cool that Subversion's birthday is

Re: 20th anniversary press?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:07 AM Doug Robinson wrote: > Folks: > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 9:21 AM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > >> It's super cool that Subversion's birthday is Leap Day 2000. [1] >> > > That's amazing! First commit on a leap day?! Cool. > Not just any leap day, one that happens

Re: Svn server images / appliances / packages

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:40 AM Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: > > Nathan Hartman wrote: > >> If there is a defined "reference system," that makes it possible to > >> focus on making that configuration as turn-key as possible, and also > >> to document it as well as possible. > > If I

Re: 20th anniversary press?

Folks: On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 9:21 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > We're coming up on the 20th anniversary of the first commit to > > Subversion's CVS repository: > > > > [[[ > > % svn log ^/subversion -r 0:HEAD -l 3 | vipe > >

Re: Svn server images / appliances / packages

Branko Čibej wrote: Nathan Hartman wrote: If there is a defined "reference system," that makes it possible to focus on making that configuration as turn-key as possible, and also to document it as well as possible. If I understand correctly, the point is to concentrate on one system in our

Re: 20th anniversary press?

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 9:00 AM Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > >> Nathan Hartman wrote on Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:21:33 -0500: >> > Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > > >> > > We're coming up on the 20th anniversary of the first commit to >> > >

Re: "svn list -v" column alignment issue

On 2020-01-08 13:12:21 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:28:01 +0100: > > On 2020-01-07 16:10:52 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 16:17:10 +0100: > > > > On 2019-12-23 06:35:08 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >

Re: [#4843] svn wc verify -- pristine files consistency check, and possibly repair

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:27 AM Julian Foad wrote: > > Filed as http://subversion.apache.org/issue/4843 . > > We could start by defining more precisely what it needs to do. > > Some aims, in order from highest priority: >* check if any pristine file's content is corrupted (according to its >

Re: Svn server images / appliances / packages

On 10.01.2020 06:14, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 11:05 AM Julian Foad > wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote: > > [... Docker...] as much a PITA as maintaining any other server. The > > installation step is the *least* of your worries. > >

Re: [#4843] svn wc verify -- pristine files consistency check, and possibly repair

Filed as http://subversion.apache.org/issue/4843 . We could start by defining more precisely what it needs to do. Some aims, in order from highest priority: * check if any pristine file's content is corrupted (according to its filename hash) - report and rename/delete corrupted

Re: [RFC] svn wc verify -- pristine files consistency check, and possibly repair

On 10.01.2020 06:30, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 11:38 AM Julian Foad > wrote: > > Proposal: a feature to check whether a Subversion WC's pristine texts > (and potentially other metadata) are all present and uncorrupted. > Possible