Folks:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 9:21 AM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> > We're coming up on the 20th anniversary of the first commit to
> > Subversion's CVS repository:
> >
> > [[[
> > % svn log ^/subversion -r 0:HEAD -l 3 | vipe
> >
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:05 AM Markus Schaber
wrote:
> maybe we’re not „high profile“ enough as we’re in a pretty niche market,
> but I talked to our marketing department and we could provide a
> testimonial. We’re using SVN both as source control system for most of our
> product developments,
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
PRNG makes the test code harder to read and to maintain, makes it
more difficult to diagnose FAILs, and increases the risk of a bug
PRNG use makes for reasonably compact and readable test generation, and
totally easy enough to reproduce and diagnose failures, IMO.
On
Branko Čibej wrote:
Why are we overthinking this?
Indeed. There is a lot of energy going in to this thread. It's great
to see energy and enthusiasm, but...
I know the current algorithm is sometimes annoying.
I accept sub-optimal decisions about it have been made in the past.
Any
Hi,
maybe we’re not „high profile“ enough as we’re in a pretty niche market, but I
talked to our marketing department and we could provide a testimonial. We’re
using SVN both as source control system for most of our product developments,
as well as part of one of our products (CODESYS SVN)
On 2020-01-13 16:51:25 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:26 +00:00:
> > Good point. I was about to say that in most cases, these commands are
> > run from a working copy. But I now think that caching should be done
> > under the user's home (just like with
Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:24 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:14:42 +:
> > The suggestion was that we should prefer the regression test suite to be
> > deterministic, [...]
> But unlike nearly all of the test suite, we don't
7 matches
Mail list logo
