On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Tue Aug 3 22:46:10 2010
New Revision: 982057
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982057view=rev
Log:
Add compression, memory-cache-size and open-file-count
command line parameters to svnserve. The latter
Hi all,
Other priorities have unfortunately kept me from focusing on the
project of speeding up blame. But recently I've spent some time
thinking about it, reading the other mail threads, studying the code
and profiling a little bit. I hope I can still do something useful for
blame, whether it be
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Greg Hudson ghud...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:57 -0400, Julian Foad wrote:
I'm wary of embedding any client functionality in the server, but I
guess it's worth considering if it would be that useful. If so, let's
take great care to ensure it's
Hi devs,
While Looking to improve performance of svn annotate [1], I found
that the current blame algorithm is mainly client-side bound, and that
most of its time is spent on svn diff (calls to svn_diff_file_diff_2
from add_file_blame in blame.c). Apart from avoiding to build
full-texts and
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi @all,
I just finished my porting work; the performance branch
is now fully synchronized with my prototype code.
From my point of view, review can start now.
According to my measurements, the code is now
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Can you show a profiler run that illustrates where the client is
spending most of its time during diff? That would probably help with
getting
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Feh, I just redid my apr_time_now+printf profiling with a release
build (of trunk), instead of a debug build, and that makes a *big*
difference. Total time of the svn_diff_diff call is now down to ~300
ms. Still a lot
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing that occurred to me: since most time of the current
blame implementation is spent on diff (svn_diff_file_diff_2), maybe
a quick win could be to simply (?) optimize the diff code? Or write a
specialized
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
After eliminating antivirus, and running with a release build instead
of a debug build, svn diff is just about on par with GNU diff. So this
eliminates the option of optimizing diff ...
Unless ...
For every diff during
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi @all,
I just finished my porting work; the performance branch
is now fully synchronized
Hi,
I've taken the performance branch for a spin. Some of performance
increases are awesome (svn log is ~4 times faster on my machine
(tested with a file with 300 revisions)).
However, I also experienced a crash of svnserve, for both svn log
and svn blame of a big file with 2000 revisions (so
Trying again with .txt extension added.
Johan
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
Either you forgot the attachments, or they were dropped by our mailing
sw. Try adding a .txt extension.
AFAIK, the mailing
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan, you did mention Patch by for Johan's patches which you
committed, did you intend to mention Found by or Suggested by for
the other two (quoted below)?
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
On 18.08.2010 00:59, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Hi devs,
While Looking to improve performance of svn annotate [1], I found
that the current blame algorithm is mainly client-side bound, and that
most of its time is spent on svn
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
After eliminating antivirus, and running with a release build instead
of a debug build, svn diff is just about on par with GNU diff. So
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
However, I also experienced a crash of svnserve, for both svn log
and svn blame of a big file with 2000 revisions (so this is quite
an extreme case). See both .log files in attachment
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Aug 29 10:32:08 2010
New Revision: 990537
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=990537view=rev
Log:
Looking for the cause of Johan Corveleyn's crash (see
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 16:24:24 +0200:
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Aug 29 10:32:08 2010
New Revision: 990537
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:32 PM, stefan2_at_apache.org wrote:
/ Author: stefan2 /
/ Date: Sun Aug 29 10:32:08 2010 /
/ New Revision: 990537 /
/ /
/ URL: http://svn.apache.org
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
I thought so ;) To narrow down the nature of the problem,
I added some checks that should be able to discern plain
data corruption
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.commailto:
jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice
Stefan,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Some additional info:
- I couldn't reproduce the crash with a narrow range. Not even 9:0 would
crash it (right after startup).
- BUT: if after 9:0 I run log without -r arguments, I get an error
Hi devs,
From what I understand about the performance problems of WC-1 vs.
WC-NG, and what I'm reading on this list, I expect(ed) a huge
performance boost from WC-NG for certain client operations (especially
on Windows, where the locking of WC-1 is quite problematic). Also, I
knew I had to wait
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Stefan,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Some additional info:
- I couldn't reproduce the crash with a narrow range. Not even 9:0 would
crash it (right after startup
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
The only way to get
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:45 PM, joha...@tigris.org wrote:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3474
--- Additional comments from joha...@tigris.org Fri Sep 10 14:45:17 -0700
2010 ---
This issue seems to be fixed on trunk. The described scenario now goes as
Hi,
The mails coming from the SVN issue tracker (on the issues mailing
list) still contain the old d...@s.t.o address as reply-to. Could
someone change this to the d...@s.a.o address?
Cheers,
--
Johan
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
svn_diff uses basically
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
On 15.09.2010 14:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Some update on this: I have implemented this for svn_diff (excluding
the identical prefix and suffix of both files, and only then starting
to fill up the token tree and let the lcs
Hi devs,
As discussed in [1], here is a patch that makes svn_diff_diff
(libsvn_diff/diff.c) skip the identical prefix and suffix of the
original and modified files, before starting the LCS (longest common
subsequence) algorithm on the non-matching part.
This makes diff a lot faster (especially
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the feedback.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Index: subversion/include/svn_diff.h
===
--- subversion/include/svn_diff.h (revision 1001548)
+++
Hi devs,
As per Daniel Shahaf's suggestion, I'm continuing this discussion on
the dev list. See the previous mails in this thread on the users list
for some context (or
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2010-09/0406.shtml). I'll summarize
below.
This issue reproduces with 1.6.12 as well as with
Hi devs,
The following tests fail on my machine (Windows XP 32-bit, built with
VCE 2008, ra_local):
- prop-tests.py 33: test properties of obstructed subdirectories
svn: Can't open directory
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 1:51
To: Subversion Development
Subject: trunk
Hi,
Here is a second iteration of the patch. It now passes make check.
Differences from the previous version are:
- Support for \r eol-style (\n and \r\n was already ok).
- The number of prefix_lines is now passed to svn_diff__lcs, so it can
use that value to set the position offset of the EOF
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is a second iteration of the patch. It now passes make check.
Differences from the previous version are:
- Support for \r eol-style (\n and \r\n was already ok).
- The number of prefix_lines is now passed
Hi all,
This is a follow-up to the WIP-patches I posted last week [1], which
are about improving performance of svn_diff (and therefor also blame
on the client-side), especially for large files.
To summarize: the idea was (is) to strip off the identical prefix and
suffix, and then letting the
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Tino,
svn cp ^^/trunk ^^/tags/RELEASE-1.0.0 -m- Tagging
The usage of the doubled ^ is just as an example, cause i know
on Windows you already have to type the doubled ^ because of the shell.
So what should
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, 8 Oct 2010 at 01:44 -:
With suffix-lines-to-keep=50, you'd need to insert a
block of text that has its last 50 lines identical to the 50 lines
preceding the insertion point, to mess
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Just one more thing: as I mentioned in my rather long mail, blame
would benefit the most from my optimization if the server were
Ok, third iteration of the patch in attachment. It passes make check.
As discussed in [1], this version keeps 50 lines of the identical
suffix around, to give the algorithm a good chance to generate a diff
output of good quality (in all but the most extreme cases, this will
be the same as with
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-09, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Ok, third iteration of the patch in attachment. It passes make check.
As discussed in [1], this version keeps 50 lines of the identical
suffix around, to give the algorithm
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 14:21:09 +0200:
(side-note: I considered first doing suffix scanning, then prefix
scanning, so I could reuse the buffers/pointers from diff_baton all
the time, and still
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 15:46
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: trunk failing tests on Windows XP (32 bit
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
But this makes me think, it looks to me like this whole
prefix-suffix-skipping functionality would fit better inside the
lower-level diff
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 1 oktober 2010 15:46
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw that the problem was fixed in r102170 by Bert
s/r102170/r1021760/
I really should install that Undo send google labs extension :)
--
Johan
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:19 PM, phi...@apache.org wrote:
Author: philip
Date: Fri Oct 15 14:19:36 2010
New Revision: 1022931
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1022931view=rev
Log:
Implement status using per-dir queries. On my machine (Linux, local
disk) this improves the speed of
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Stefan Küng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.10.2010 20:13, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
This has been fixed in serf trunk r1408 for a while, but hasn't shown
up in a serf patch release yet.
Sorry, I should have checked the serf commits first.
Thanks for the
Hi devs,
In the context of the diff optimization patch I'm working on ([1]),
I'm wondering if diff4 is actually used in svn. If I look for usages
of subversion/libsvn_diff/diff4.c#svn_diff_diff4, I only come up with
tools/diff/diff4.c#main.
So: this code isn't used in the svn core itself? What's
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:31 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-09, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:57 AM
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 23:43 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com
wrote
Hi,
I recently verified that the following two issues are fixed on trunk:
- #3429: svn mv A B; svn mv B A generates replace without history
- #3474: making a new subdir, moving files into it and then renaming
the subdir, breaks history of the moved files
Should I mark these as fixed in the
Almost forgot about this. It's now filed in the issue tracker:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Cheers,
Johan
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
As per Daniel Shahaf's suggestion, I'm continuing this discussion
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these
issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed),
after which they can be marked
The attached patch expands the test move_file_back_and_forth
(copy_tests.py 45) as a regression test for issue#3429.
[[[
Expand move_file_back_and_forth test to verify issue #3429
(svn mv A B; svn mv B A generates replace without history).
* subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch expands the test move_file_back_and_forth
(copy_tests.py 45) as a regression test for issue#3429.
[[[
Expand move_file_back_and_forth test to verify issue #3429
(svn mv A B; svn mv B A generates
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:25:24 +0100:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
Or, maybe the best approach
[ adding dev@ to discussion between danielsh and me about
(non-)progress of the diff-optimizations work. ]
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
[ if you want to, you can add dev@ to the CC on replies. ]
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 00
. But the
discussion continued about why this is so hard right now, and if there
are alternative approaches. See below...
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 21:20:28 +0100:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf d
Hi devs,
As mentioned in [1], I've created two branches to try out two
different approaches for the diff optimizations of prefix/suffix
scanning.
The first one, diff-optimizations-bytes, has a working implementation
of the optimization. It still has some open todo items, but it
basically works.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 00:25:27 +0100:
I am now considering to abandon the tokens-approach, for the following
reasons:
...
So, unless someone can convince me otherwise, I'm probably going
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:05:29 +0100:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 00:25:27 +0100:
I am now
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
[ finally getting back to this mail; having slept on it, etc. ]
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 13:34:48 +0100:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Johan
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi Johan.
I've just read the whole of this thread.
I didn't quite understand your original point (2) that token-based
suffix scanning will not be as fast as byte-based suffix scanning.
Sure it won't, but is there
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Bill Tutt b...@tutts.org wrote:
Note: This email only tangentially relates to svn diff and more about
reverse token scanning in general:
As someone who has implemented suffix reverse token scanning before:
Thanks for the input. It's nice to see other people
Hi,
This question came up during recent discussion about the
diff-optimizations-tokens branch [1]:
What are the known implementors of svn_diff_fns_t, the vtable of
svn_diff callback functions in subversion/include/svn_diff.h? Besides
the internal diff_memory.c and diff_file.c that is.
Are there
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch expands the test move_file_back_and_forth
(copy_tests.py 45) as a regression
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
On 15.12.2010 02:30, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Some considerations:
- Maybe I can use APR_INLINE, with similar results?
- Maybe I can put just the critical section into a macro
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann eq...@web.de wrote:
On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Johan ;)
Hi Stefan, thanks for the input :). I suspected that you might have
some ideas about this ...
On the diff-optimizations-bytes branch, in diff_file.c
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I did my measurements with a blame operation on this very large
file, which has ~2500 revisions. So that's 2500 diffs of a ~1,5 Mb
file
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
New macro version (increment only, decrement is similar):
[[[
/* For all files in the FILE array, increment the curp pointer. If a file
* points before the beginning
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
New macro version (increment only, decrement is similar):
[[[
/* For all files in the FILE array
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann eq...@web.de wrote:
On 20.12.2010 02:43, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stefan Fuhrmanneq...@web.de wrote:
On 15.12.2010 02:30, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Thoughts?
Two
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 19.10.2010 15:10, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:31:42 -0400:
Personally, I see [FSv2] as a broad swath of API changes to align our
needs with the underlying storage.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann eq...@web.de wrote:
On 20.12.2010 02:43, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stefan Fuhrmanneq...@web.de wrote:
On 15.12.2010 02:30, Stefan
[ Taking a privately-started discussion with danielsh to the list, in
case others have inspiration/insight about this. Question at hand: I'm
having trouble making diff3 work with prefix/suffix scanning of the
diff-optimizations-bytes branch. Any feedback is highly appreciated
:-). ]
On Fri, Dec
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286view=rev
Log:
XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_send_txstream.
Therefore, speed up string matching code
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286view=rev
Log:
XDelta calculation is major
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286view=rev
Log:
XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_send_txstream.
Therefore, speed up string matching code
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 02.01.2011 16:38, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM,stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan,
I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When
I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't
appear when I ran it with a trunk build. (See attached transcript.)
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan,
I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When
I
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at how
svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in
your branch.
One night and most of the following day later, I think I made it
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at how
svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in
your
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
Thursday night I did something stupid and had
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com
wrote:
[... snip ...]
And it's fast too! It's taking only 58 seconds in diff, vs. 72
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-01, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[ Taking a privately-started discussion with danielsh to the list, in
case others have inspiration/insight about this. Question at hand: I'm
having trouble making diff3 work
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:34 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Mon Jan 3 18:34:35 2011
New Revision: 1054701
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054701view=rev
Log:
Fix JavaHL build and test failures introduced in r1054680.
*
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for the script, it gives me some good inspiration.
However, it doesn't fit well with the optimization that's currently
being done on the diff-optimizations-bytes
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com
wrote:
For now, some
Hi,
As the guy responsible for the quote that started this thread ([1]):
Actually, what's a little bit troubling is that there are currently
only 3 possible file_len's, of which only 2 are used in practice:
diff2 and diff3 (diff4 is not used in svn core, only in
tools/diff/diff4). So, if we
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
[ ... snip ... ]
But I think, the stack variable is certainly helpful
and easy to do.
Ok, I've done this (locally, still have to clean
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 18.01.2011 12:56, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
It would be interesting to see where the biggest gains
are coming from (I'm guessing from the per-machine-word
reading/comparing; I'd like to try that first, maybe
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
It would be interesting to see where the biggest gains
are coming from (I'm guessing from
Hi,
Already for some time now, update_tests.py 58 (XFAIL: update a
nonexistent child of a copied dir) crashes on my machine:
svn: In file '..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_wc\update_editor.c' line
4877: assertion failed (repos_root != NULL repos_uuid != NULL)
I understand that this test is
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann eq...@web.de wrote:
On 29.12.2010 01:58, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 19.10.2010 15:10, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:31:42
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann eq...@web.de wrote:
[ ... snip ...]
And, as promised, here some ideas how to get more
speed from the generic code. Your latest commit:
+#if SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK
+
+ /* Skip quickly over the stuff between EOLs. */
+ for (i = 0,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
Johan (and other interested parties),
I've been following some of the commits to the
diff-optimizations-branch with interest. While I've not reviewed them
for technical merit, it appears that others have, and that
1 - 100 of 1221 matches
Mail list logo
