On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100:
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Johan,
>> >
>> > I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent t
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at how
> svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in
> your branch.
>
> One night and most of the following day later, I think I made it
> a few percent faster
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at how
>> svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in
>> y
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Johan,
>>>
>>> Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleyn
>> wrote:
>>>
[... snip ...]
>>> And it's fast too! It's taking only 58 seconds in &qu
Hi,
I'm wondering why svnlook doesn't support the same diff options (-x
flags or others) as svn does. Is it just a question of tuits? Or there
some specific reason why "svnlook diff" doesn't support '-x-p'
(--show-c-function) and the new '--git'?
If the answer is "tuits", I'd like to give it a sh
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-01, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> [ Taking a privately-started discussion with danielsh to the list, in
>> case others have inspiration/insight about this. Question at hand: I'm
>> having trouble mak
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> Another question: a shell script might not be good, because not
>> portable (and not fast)? Should I use python for this? Maybe the
>> "write line by line with a line number
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:34 PM, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Mon Jan 3 18:34:35 2011
> New Revision: 1054701
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054701&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix JavaHL build and test failures introduced in r1054680.
>
> * subversion/bindings/javahl/native/CreateJ.cpp,
>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Hyrum Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 7:34 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Mon Jan 3 18:34:35 2011
>>> New Revision: 1054701
>>>
>>&
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> Thanks for the script, it gives me some good inspiration.
>>
>> However, it doesn't fit well with the optimization that's currently
>> being done on the diff-optimization
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleyn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn
>>> wrote:
&g
Hi,
As the guy responsible for the quote that started this thread ([1]):
> Actually, what's a little bit troubling is that there are currently
> only 3 possible "file_len's", of which only 2 are used in practice:
> diff2 and diff3 (diff4 is not used in svn core, only in
> tools/diff/diff4). So, i
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
[ ... snip ... ]
>> But I think, the stack variable is certainly helpful
>> and easy to do.
Ok, I've done this (locally, still have to clean up a litt
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On 18.01.2011 12:56, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Johan Corveleyn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
>>> wrote:
>&
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> It would be interesting to see where the biggest gains
>> are coming from (I'm guessing from the "per-machine-word"
>> reading/comparing; I'd like t
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
>> On 03.01.2011 02:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> It would be interesting to see where the biggest gains
>>> are coming from (I'm guessing from
Hi,
Already for some time now, update_tests.py 58 (XFAIL: update a
nonexistent child of a copied dir) crashes on my machine:
svn: In file '..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_wc\update_editor.c' line
4877: assertion failed (repos_root != NULL && repos_uuid != NULL)
I understand that this test is XFAI
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 29.12.2010 01:58, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19.10.2010 15:10, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>
>>&
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
[ ... snip ...]
> And, as promised, here some ideas how to get more
> speed from the generic code. Your latest commit:
>
> +#if SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK
> +
> + /* Skip quickly over the stuff between EOLs. */
> + for (i = 0, can_r
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Johan (and other interested parties),
> I've been following some of the commits to the
> diff-optimizations-branch with interest. While I've not reviewed them
> for technical merit, it appears that others have, and that there is
> good work
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:31:11 +0100:
>>> Revving svn_diff_fns_t: what do you mean with parallelizing it? I must
>>> admit
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> Hi @all,
>>
>> I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th.
>> Speak now or forever hold your peace.
>>
>> Rationale:
>>
>> I've been testing / using that code for a whil
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 15:18:24 +0100:
>> - The only internal caller of the "old" function 'datasource_open'
>> (for a single datasource) doesn't call it anymore
>> (t
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> ...
>>> * revv svn_diff.h#svn_diff_fns_t []
>>>
>>> It looks like, for the most part, any destabilizing functionality is
>>&
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
> few questions.
>
> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
> is work going on in the branch ignore-mergeinfo which addresses
>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Johan,
> I'd appreciate review on the attached patch. It is an attempt to rev
> the svn_diff_fns_t struct and related functions. You'll notice that I
> commented out the use of datasources_open in both diff_file.c and
> diff_memory.c, in a
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 27.01.2011 01:56, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>>>
>&
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>>> Johan (and other interested parties),
>>> I've been following some of the
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan,
>
> I'm concerned about this change: on the one hand, it's untested and
> no one claims to be understanding the code; on the other hand, it
> doesn't exactly parallel the diff3 change:
>
> specifically, the last hunk of the diff3 patch
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for taking a look. However ...
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:17 AM, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Sun Jan 30 03:17:54 2011
> New Revision: 1065170
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1065170&view=rev
> Log:
> On the 'diff-optimizations-bytes' branch:
>
> Silence compiler
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 14:04:07 +0100:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > May I suggest that, if this code is to be released, then you validate
>> >
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:42:11 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Already for some time now, update_tests.py 58 (XFAIL: update a
>> nonexistent child of a copied dir) crashes on my mach
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: dinsdag 1 februari 2011 13:28
>> To: Daniel Shahaf
>> Cc: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Re: Assertio
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: dinsdag 1 februari 2011 13:28
>>&g
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Johan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Johan Corveleyn
>> wrote:
>> > it continues until test nr 58, and then gives the popup.
>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 13:28:24 +0100:
>> So: I've tried removing SVN_USE_WIN32_CRASHHANDLER from gen_win.py
>> (put it in comment, ran "nmake config" and rebuilt everything), then
>
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:47:50 +0100:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 14:04:07 +0100:
>> >> On
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> I would not worry about existing clients -- simply mark the existing
>> APIs as deprecated, but keep them and do not attempt to improve their
>> performance.
>
> Neglecting per
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> I would not worry about existing clients -- simply mark the existing
>>> APIs as depre
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> I just finished the review of the changes on your branch.
> Except for a few minor hints, everything looks fine and
> should be merged to /trunk. The two findings can be
> addressed on /trunk directly.
Thanks. Reintegrated it
Please do not cross-post between users@ and dev@. This is really a
usage question (not about the development of subversion), so belongs
on users@.
[ I've left dev@ in cc for this one reply, please drop it from further
replies. ]
More below ...
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Vishal Jain wrote:
Apparently I broke the builds on the builtbots yesterday evening,
after integrating the diff-optimizations-bytes branch. Sorry for that.
There were two problems:
- Failing diff-diff3-test.exe (actually hanging). This was rectified
in r1067839.
- Failing (python) bindings. I could use some help wi
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>>>
>>>> Apparently I broke the builds o
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:55:47AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >
>> > > Where is the temporary table stored?
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I ran into this while trying to 'svn up' today, and managed to reproduce
> it in another working copy:
>
> % svn revert -R .
> % cat ./before
> Index: subversion/include/svn_diff.h
>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> I ran into this while trying to 'svn up' today, and managed to reproduce
>> it in another working copy:
>>
>> % svn revert -R .
>>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:45:03PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> > wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:45:03PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Feb 8,
Try sending a mail to dev-unsubscr...@subversion.apache.org
Johan
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Stimely, Noelle
wrote:
> How do I unsubscribe to this group?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Noelle
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 21:47:12 -0600:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 13:20:29 +0100:
>> >> On Fri, F
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> In other news, I looked into the cause --- tried to make
> datasource_get_next_token() do one more loop in the place where
> currently it does 'return if at_start_of_suffix()' --- but that didn't
> fix the truncation...
Indeed, that won't fi
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:51, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> On 10.02.2011 22:15, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:25, Stefan Fuhrmann
>>> wrote:
Hi there,
Those among you following the commits will have
Hi,
Currently (trunk@1068411), cat_tests.py 5 (cat should skip uncattable
resources) is failing on my machine (Windows XP). There seems to be
some double-escaping of the path in the expected error message. I
don't understand why this only happens on my machine, and not for
instance on the Windows
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 21:21:20 +0100:
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Bill Tutt wrote:
>> > If tokens include keyword expansion operations then stop once you
>> > hit one. The possible
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 01:04, wrote:
>> Author: jcorvel
>> Date: Sun Feb 6 23:04:04 2011
>> New Revision: 1067800
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067800&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Reintegrate diff-optimizations-bytes branch with trunk.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:45:03PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 20
Hi,
Here are some more ideas for optimizing "svn diff". Maybe I should
start to write up a notes file, but for now I'm settling for a list in
a mail.
[ note: these ideas are not original, other people have observed some
of these as well (and discussed on IRC and all), and some inspiration
also co
2011/2/15 Branko Čibej :
> On 15.02.2011 01:42, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> 2) Faster hash function for hashing lines. [ Quick win ]
>>
>> - Currently, we use adler32 (after the line has been normalized).
>>
>> - GNU diff uses some simple bit shifting scheme, which s
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sat Feb 19 09:31:01 2011
> New Revision: 1072282
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072282&view=rev
> Log:
> Public definitions should be prefixed by SVN_. Thus, rename the default
> compression level and introduce boundar
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 00:38, wrote:
>> Author: jcorvel
>> Date: Fri Feb 11 21:38:55 2011
>> New Revision: 1069961
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069961&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Re-enable elimination of the identical suffix for diff
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Mark Mielke wrote:
> On 02/20/2011 03:50 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:37, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>>
>>> The fopen() calls should be eliminated by the
>>> file handle cache. IOW, they should already be
>>> addressed on the performance br
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> "Bert Huijben" writes:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej
>>> Sent: maandag 21 februari 2011 13:19
>>> To: Philip Martin
>>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subject: R
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 15.02.2011 01:42, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are some more ideas for optimizing "svn diff". Maybe I should
>> start to write up a notes file, but for now I'm settling fo
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> (I've appended the issue subject to the subject line.)
>>
>> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> I filed a new issue today (issue #3818, "fix handling of externals in
>>> wc-ng" http://subversio
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Stas Cherkassky wrote:
> Julian,
>
> I don't want to remove parts of the tree from the repository.
> What I want is, effectively, a way to independently mark separate
> parts of the tree with the same tag.
> (I tried to explain it in my example). I don't see how you
You have bumped into a known issue [1], which is fixed in svn 1.6.6.
So upgrading to TortoiseSVN 1.6.6 should help.
[1] http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3485
Regards,
Johan
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Razmik Shahinian
wrote:
> in file
> TortoiseSVN-1.6.3\ext\subversion\li
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Instead, we could not store size and mtime at all! :)
>>
>> Or we could store both to perform simple consistency checks...
>
> Dunno about that, but the storage of SIZE is part of the (intended)
> algorithm for pristine storage. It is allowed
A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems
slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It looks like
it's indented too much, making it appear to be right aligned. On IE 8
it shows up correctly though (meaning it seems ok to me, it's the same
as in FF).
Johan
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems
>> slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It looks like
>> it's indented too much, making it appear to be right aligned. On IE 8
>>
Hi devs,
A small question in anticipation of 1.7: will an (FSFS) repo benifit
from a dump/reload when upgrading from 1.6 to 1.7? Or will a simple
"upgrade" (followed maybe by a "pack" to pack the revprops) provide
just the same?
Reason for asking: We're currently still running on 1.5, and plannin
Hi devs,
I think I may have found a bug in fs_fs.c, while I was
examining/profiling the code. However, I am completely new at
subversion development, and quite unexperienced in c (I'm a java
developer actually, with some notions of c, but trying to learn fast),
so I may be imagining things. If so,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> Looking at the source code I see:
>> - get_dir_contents calls read_representation
>> - read_representation calls rep_read_get_baton, which creates a
>> rep_read_baton and opens the
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Matthew Bentham wrote:
> On 22/02/2010 11:42, Matthew Bentham wrote:
>>
>> On 22/02/2010 11:13, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> Matthew Bentham writes:
>>>
For me on CYGWIN_NT-6.0-WOW64 brahe 1.7.1(0.218/5/3) 2009-12-07 11:48
i686 Cygwin
>>>
>>> Thanks fo
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:01 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> Copy is a little different. For that, I would like to be able to
>> specifically ask SVN to do it, which is what you are saying here. If
>> an item is moved, I do not think you should even have to ask.
>
> Agreed
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:14 AM, neels wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 03:57, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:26, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>>> Mark Phippard wrote:
Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
>>>
>>> Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-07, Stefan Fuhrman wrote:
>> Speed up input stream processing in config parser and
>> others that read single bytes from a stream.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_subr/subst.c
>> (translated_stream_read): Add an optimized code path
>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 17:01, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Philip Martin wrote:
>>> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Julian Foad
>>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 17:01, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Philip Martin wrote:
>>>> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>>>>
>>>>>
Hi devs,
I know a lot of you are mostly focused on wc-ng work right now (which
is a good thing: focus is good, wc-ng is good). But I'd like to
highlight two other important issues, which can IMHO be very confusing
to users, and which I think should definitely be fixed by 1.7 (or if
possible, soone
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:10:06PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> * http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3525 - Locked
>> file which is scheduled for delete causes tree conflict
>
> This on
Thanks, Stefan. Your answers were very enlightening, as always :-).
I really hope TC handling can be improved for cases like these
(resolving them automatically or avoiding them), if possible even for
1.7. I have no idea how you guys are progressing on this front, but I
guess a lot of the potentia
Hi all,
I'm very much looking forward to the performance (and other)
improvements wc-ng will bring us. But there's more to svn performance
than wc stuff :-). In our company, "svn annotate/blame/praise" is a
known offender (people who attended subconf 2009 may remember me as
the guy who complained
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-21, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[ ... ]
>> (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3074#desc5):
>>
>> [[[
>> My idea for client-side improvement:
>>
>> The client, while receivin
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Philipp Marek
wrote:
> Hello Julian,
> Hello Johan,
Hi Philipp,
Thanks for joining the discussion. All input is really welcome. Julian
has already responded to your suggestions, but it got me thinking ...
see below.
> On Montag, 22. März 2010, Julian Foad wrote
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 00:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 20:37, wrote:
+Some other random stuff Hyrum would like to talk about:
+ * Why is merge slow (
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
>> However, looking at Julian's binary blame algorithm, I can't help but
>> wonder why this binary structure couldn't be calculated on the server
&
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> In most setups I've seen the server hardware is much beefier than
>> the client hardware, so unless we do things that scale really badly
>> (say more than O(n^2)) I don't see a pro
A bit late perhaps, but also from me a big +1 to this vision and
roadmap proposal.
There are some minor points which can be discussed of course (as
always), but overall I think it's a very good plan. I especially
applaud the initiative itself to spend some time for this, taking a
step back, lookin
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
[...]
> COMMUNITY
> [...]
>
> But communication alone isn't enough. We need to find ways to grow our
> developer community itself. Attendance at the recent Subversion Corporation
> Annual Members Meeting was low (by design and recommendati
Hi devs,
Just a heads up, not really important, but I came across this in
blame_cmd.c (inside print_line_info):
[[[
const char *rev_str = SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(revision)
? apr_psprintf(pool, "%6ld", revision)
: " -";
]]]
Which means that users of a repo with over
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Just a heads up, not really important, but I came across this in
>> blame_cmd.c (inside print_line_i
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Bolstridge, Andrew wrote:
>> To get new developers, I think the first thing that needs to be done
>> is to make entry easier. That means providing a setup ready-to-debug
>> for people. The initial hurdle on any software project is getting set
Hi all,
Sorry it took a while to respond (been away for a while). I've been
thinking a little about this, looking at the code ...
I see 3 options:
1) Determine the max length of revnum (and author) in blame.c, either
while building the blame chunks or in an extra loop before sending the
blame in
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sorry it took a while to respond (been away for a while). I've been
>> thinking a little about this, looking at the code ...
>>
>> I see 3 options:
>
2010/4/19 Julian Foad :
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Instead why not do the following:
>> >
>> > * Determining the max length for the revision number is a petty much
>> > constant-time op
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:mphipp...@collab.net]
>> Sent: maandag 26 april 2010 16:03
>> To: CollabNet Subversion Client
>> Subject: Re: svn looses history when moving directories
>>
>> On 4/26/10 9:42 AM, "Piet
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
[...]
> We use that in a hook script that forbids
> commits that replace nodes -- because some users often do that by accident,
> fragmenting history --
Probably because of this bug?
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
Hi devs,
As I said in the mail thread about the misaligned blame output [1], I
wanted to get the test suite running first. However, after spending
some time with it, I still have 15 failing tests. I'd like that number
to be 0 before I start hacking. Or is it known/expected that certain
tests are c
- APR 1.3.8
- Neon 0.28.6 (I don't think that's relevant, since the tests are over ra_local)
- Serf 0.3.0 (ditto)
Cheers,
Johan
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> As I said in the mail thread about the misaligned blame output [1], I
> want
101 - 200 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
