Re: Hashtable data freed before pool cleanup

On 07.01.2010 16:12, Bert Huijben wrote: Hi, Looking at apr's 1.3.x branch: In r817810 a change to the hash table implementation was introduced, which moves the data of a hash table from the main pool to a subpool (as seen from the pool passed to apr_hash_make).

Re: svn commit: r1845312 - /subversion/trunk/tools/dist/backport.pl

On 2018/10/31 06:54:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Good morning Ruediger, > > rpl...@apache.org wrote on Wed, 31 Oct 2018 06:45 +: > > Adjust grep syntax to be able to run it with Perl 5.16.3. > > > > * tools/dist/backport.pl > > (vote) Adjust grep syntax to be able to run it with Perl

Re: svn commit: r1845204 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c mod_dav_svn/mod_dav_svn.c

On 2018/10/30 18:09:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:22 +0100: > > It's important enough to be added to CHANGES, in the server-side > > bugfixes section, so please add a line there, for 1.12.0. > > Since we'll have to add this revision four times to

Re: svn commit: r1845204 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c mod_dav_svn/mod_dav_svn.c

On 2018/10/30 09:22:56, Branko Čibej wrote: > > [[[ > .../repos/1.11.x$ ../trunk/tools/dist/nominate.pl r1845204 "Prevents a crash > in mod_http2." > Index: STATUS > === > --- STATUS(revision 1845205) > +++ STATUS

Re: svn commit: r1845204 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c mod_dav_svn/mod_dav_svn.c

On 2018/10/30 21:11:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote on Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 19:57:58 -: > > BTW, I had to apply the following patch to nominate.pl to get it running > > with perl 5.16.3 on CentOS 7: > > > > In

Re: svn commit: r1845204 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c mod_dav_svn/mod_dav_svn.c

On 2018/10/30 21:03:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote on Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 20:00:01 -: > > > > > > On 2018/10/30 18:09:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:22 +0100: > > > > Should I ad

Re: Better choice for Linux semaphore than spinlock?

On 10/07/2019 08:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 19:47 Doug Robinson, > wrote: > > Folks: > > I spoke with this user late last week. They stated that they can only > get approximately 400 parallel SVN operations > before the

Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors

On 9/22/21 3:49 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Ruediger Pluem writes: > >> Does the attached patch solve your issue? > > It does appear to solve the problem with missing errors, thanks! > > I haven't checked that in detail, but I think there might be a discrepancy &

Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors

On 9/22/21 4:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 9/22/21 3:49 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: >> Ruediger Pluem writes: >> >>> Does the attached patch solve your issue? >> >> It does appear to solve the problem with missing errors, thanks! >>

Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors

Does the attached patch solve your issue? Regards Rüdiger On 9/20/21 8:01 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Hi, > > I think that I have stumbled across a significant regression in httpd 2.4.49 > where mod_dav has been changed in a way that makes it ignore the errors > returned by a versioning

Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files

On 2/21/22 11:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote on Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 08:49:08 +0100: >> On 2/19/22 5:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> I can't reproduce this. Using unpatched trunk: >> >> I checked again and I was able to reproduce it with 1.10

Re: Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files

On 2/19/22 5:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:29:12 +0100: >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:10:08AM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote: >>> On 09 Feb 2022, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>>> When rebuilding my own Subversion build I

Make 'svn patch' keep permissions of patched files

When rebuilding my own Subversion build I stumbled across the following patch that I add to my build: Index: subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c === --- subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c(revision 1897905) +++

Re: Python 3 compatibility issue in tools/hook-scripts/mailer/mailer.py

On 12/11/23 4:54 AM, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > On 2023/12/10 4:22, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2023/12/09 0:04, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: >> >>> Den fre 8 dec. 2023 kl 05:40 skrev Yasuhito FUTATSUKI < >>> futat...@yf.bsdclub.org>: >> Index: tools/hook-scripts/mailer/mailer.py

Python 3 compatibility issue in tools/hook-scripts/mailer/mailer.py

I stumbled accross a Python 3 compatibility issue in tools/hook-scripts/mailer/mailer.py. The call of self.cfg.which_groups in line 565 passes an empty string as first parameter. In which_groups this empty string is passed to to_str in line 1489. In line 88 to_str does x.decode('utf-8') In