On 2019/01/18 22:07:57, Doug Robinson wrote:
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):>
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ>
> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating>
> an error and failing to allow the use of that AuthZ
On 27.01.2019 19:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [ Sorry for the late reply; I've been offline. ]
>
> Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 15:54:40 +0100:
>> On 19.01.2019 22:24, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Thinking about this some more: If we add a warning callback to the
>>> parser (I have that
[ Sorry for the late reply; I've been offline. ]
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 15:54:40 +0100:
> On 19.01.2019 22:24, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Thinking about this some more: If we add a warning callback to the
> > parser (I have that implemented locally), we may as well relax the
> >
On 19.01.2019 22:24, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>>
>> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
>> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
>> an error and failing
On 19.01.2019 21:12, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Hi Doug!
>>
>> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>>> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>>>
>>> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
>>> file without an associated
On 19.01.2019 22:24, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>>
>> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
>> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
>> an error and failing
On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
> an error and failing to allow the use of that AuthZ file.
>
>
Brane:
See below.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 15:12 Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> Hi Doug!
>
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
> file
On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Hi Doug!
>
> On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
>> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>>
>> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
>> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
>> an error
On 19.01.2019 17:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> This is about to change. :)
I added a test for this:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1851676
-- Brane
Hi Doug!
On 18.01.2019 23:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
> Honored committers (and the rest of us):
>
> It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
> file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
> an error and failing to allow the use of that AuthZ file.
>
Honored committers (and the rest of us):
It's come to my attention that if a group is defined in an AuthZ
file without an associated account that SVN is, as of 1.10, generating
an error and failing to allow the use of that AuthZ file.
Example:
[groups]
goodGroup = acct1
goodGroup2 =
12 matches
Mail list logo
