Re: SVN working copy split DB vs. working area

Philip: Thank you for responding! On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Doug Robinson writes: > > > The general setup is that they want to have a working copy on a > > Distributed File System (DFS, e.g. Lustre) and the

Re: SVN working copy split DB vs. working area

Brane: Good to hear from you! On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 11.04.2018 20:27, Doug Robinson wrote: > > I've now seen a request for this twice in as many days. Once from > > a customer and once from someone posting to a Subversion forum > > here: >

Re: SVN working copy split DB vs. working area

Doug Robinson writes: > The general setup is that they want to have a working copy on a > Distributed File System (DFS, e.g. Lustre) and the DFS either is > very slow (when mounted with sufficient support for SQLite) or just > does not work due to a lack of support

Re: SVN working copy split DB vs. working area

On 11.04.2018 20:27, Doug Robinson wrote: > Folks: > > I've now seen a request for this twice in as many days.  Once from > a customer and once from someone posting to a Subversion forum > here: > >

SVN working copy split DB vs. working area

Folks: I've now seen a request for this twice in as many days. Once from a customer and once from someone posting to a Subversion forum here: https://www.svnforum.org/forum/opensource-subversion-forums/apache-subversion-1-8-support/80218-subversion-checkout-on-distrubuted-filesytem The general