On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:20:53PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
However, it is simply not true that it requires you to use the web
interface to do anything useful. I have been using Sage extensively
for teaching and research for the past two years and I spend 95% of my
time in the command-line
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Christoph Dibak wrote:
But is there a sort of replacement for maple? Does any less-sucking or
open-source software support the maple-worksheet (.mw) format?
Don't Maple worksheets, by definition, suck more? At least,
that's my impression of anything
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:30:10AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
I'll probably cave and just compile 3.9 soon enough but it's so untidy
to have to do that every time I install a system and I'm not up to
being maintaining packages yet (and they wouldn't take a 'beta'
anyway). Is there no way in 3.6
suckless calculators: bc, hoc
On 11/20/09, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
In the end, it depends on what you want to do with your CAS. If you
want something very precise, there is good specialised software around
(Pari was already mentioned for number theory, GAP is the way to go
for
I always find a limitation to use dmenu instead of gtk entry text
because you cannot edit the URL in a decent way.
markus schnalke wrote:
[2009-11-19 18:57] Moritz Wilhelmy c...@wzff.de
[...] editing text boxes within an external editor.
You took the words right out of my mouth.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:20:32AM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
I use a scary Firefox extension It's all text! to get my text area
editable in vim.
Perhaps something like double clicking a textarea (I don't care for
editing input type=text), would simply launch $EDITOR on it.
yes, something
We can also use $EDITOR to edit the URL address.
12:16 pancake (get uri, write in file, launch $EDITOR, set contents
of file in clipboard, set uri)
A cool thing would be to extrapolate this functionality to also edit
cookies and post data.
Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:15, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote:
There is a patch already for this (written by Gottox) which I consider
to make mainstream as well for surf integration (apart from vertical
items and an overhaul of the Key handling).
Hello, Anselm, can you describe why you
That's a *great* idea.
I don't really like to edit my url with dmenu anyway... liked the GTK
box better and I think editing it with vim would be a lot better than
GTK boxes.
Moritz
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:10:41PM +0100, pancake wrote:
We can also use $EDITOR to edit the URL address.
12:16
Methinks editing such a small thing like url with vim is a bit too much.
However, idea of editing postdata and cookies sounds really good to me.
Regards
On 20-11-2009 13:23:00, c...@wzff.de wrote:
That's a *great* idea.
I don't really like to edit my url with dmenu anyway... liked the GTK
box
2009/11/20 Michael hidden.n...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:15, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote:
There is a patch already for this (written by Gottox) which I consider
to make mainstream as well for surf integration (apart from vertical
items and an overhaul of the Key handling).
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 15:47, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote:
Aehm I was saying vertical will become mainstream...
Sorry, got to read more English. Happy to hear it, thanks.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:51:41 +0300
Michael hidden.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 15:47, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote:
Aehm I was saying vertical will become mainstream...
Sorry, got to read more English. Happy to hear it, thanks.
I also read the original message as
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Kris Maglione maglion...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
I'm interested in math and CASs, but my opinions on available software
are ill-formed and mostly ignorant. Does anyone else here have an
interest in this
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
Fortran is nowadays seldom used, few people can tell if it sucks in the
sense of suckless (?).
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
Fortran is nowadays
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53:47PM +, David Tweed wrote:
FWIW, my understanding is that the LAPACK library must have an API
which conforms with a reference Fortran implementation, but there are
various versions
On 11/20/09, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
LAPACK is about floating point
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:57:24PM +, David Tweed wrote:
I was pointing out more how the simple-minded software metrics would
condemn you to around about the level of performance acheived by the
reference LAPACK (white bars) in the paper referenced, which to my
mind suggests there's a flaw
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:57:24PM +, David Tweed wrote:
I was pointing out more how the simple-minded software metrics would
condemn you to around about the level of performance acheived by the
reference LAPACK (white
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:56:07PM +, David Tweed wrote:
I think it's just a difference in when we'd use words like terrible.
Well, being on a suckless list, I tend to agree with suckless' definitions
of terrible.
Perhaps all this could be elaborated from a different angle. Most of the
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53:47PM +, David Tweed wrote:
As for the code quality, I can see the code driving certain people
on this list mad because it deliberately doesn't compute things in the
simplest way and fewest lines in order to do things like acheive close
to optimal cache blocking
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:29:55PM -0800, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
I see a gray foo string inside the first item in wmii9menu
Works for me. Also, `hg grep -r tip foo` doesn't show any results.
Thanks for fixing this!
2009/11/20 Kris Maglione maglion...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
I'm interested in math and CASs, but my opinions on available software
are ill-formed and mostly ignorant. Does anyone else here have an
interest in this topic, broadly speaking? If
On 11/20/09, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote:
Why not? I think it should be possible to have very minimalist and
specialized CAS', they managed to do that in the 50s and 60s, why not
today?
ah good old reduce
25 matches
Mail list logo
