On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:47:19AM +0300, anonymous wrote:
Ok, code is here: http://bitbucket.org/noname/netscan/
Nice, but there is no license on the source code files.
Here is a patch to let it build on OpenBSD:
--- parse.c.origSat Jan 2 12:54:18 2010
+++ parse.c Sat Jan 2
licenses are stupid
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Colin Didier cdid...@cybione.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:47:19AM +0300, anonymous wrote:
Ok, code is here: http://bitbucket.org/noname/netscan/
Nice, but there is no license on the source code files.
Here is a patch to let it
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
licenses are stupid
I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
Will adding of /* Public Domain */ into every source file be enough?
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, anonymous aim0s...@lavabit.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
licenses are stupid
I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
Will adding of /* Public Domain */ into every source file be enough?
Some parts
ev'ning everyone,
i got some obscure behaviour of gcc/icc over here,
is there anyone able to tell my why this happens/works?
v4hn 18:52:19 ~/repos/netscan $ gcc -lpthread -lpcap *.o -o portscan
network.o: In function `default_device':
network.c:(.text+0x5d5): undefined reference to
so I needed the following patch to compile it over here on my (lunar-)linux
box.
--- makefile 2010-01-02 18:56:40.0 +0100
+++ makefile.patched 2010-01-02 18:58:08.0 +0100
@@ -13 +13 @@
- $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG)
+ $(CC) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG) $(LDFLAGS)
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:38:36PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
--- makefile2010-01-02 18:56:40.0 +0100
+++ makefile.patched 2010-01-02 18:58:08.0 +0100
@@ -13 +13 @@
- $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG)
+ $(CC) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG) $(LDFLAGS)
Will it
Something from gcc manpage:
It makes a difference where in the command you write this option; the
linker searches and processes libraries and object files in the order
they are specified. Thus, foo.o -lz bar.o searches library z after
file foo.o but before bar.o. If bar.o refers to functions in
Some parts of the world (I think DE is one of them) don't recognize
the phrase public domain to mean anything in particular, so you have
to write what you mean it to say. Something like This software is in
the public domain. That means that you can ...
Often it's better to listen to your
What does it matter that it runs on a vm?
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Andres P 97.56...@gmail.com wrote:
Like ^ said, it basically runs on a vm.
And it was inspired by C++. Going more into how C++ sucks would sadly
(gladly?) be OT.
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:35:44AM +0300, anonymous wrote:
Something from gcc manpage:
It makes a difference where in the command you write this option; the
linker searches and processes libraries and object files in the order
they are specified. Thus, foo.o -lz bar.o searches library z
On 01/03/2010 01:11 AM, hiro wrote:
Often it's better to listen to your intuition and ignore German laws.
Especially if you are no lawyer and just read about so-called laws on
Wikipedia.
most stupid idea ever. if you're in the software industry and wish to make your
source public you should
Fellow wmii users,
I'm pleased to announce the next evolution of my YAML-based Ruby wmiirc:
http://github.com/sunaku/wmiirc
The big idea, suggested by Nathan Neff, is that the config.yaml file
should be able to import other YAML files (partials as I call them).
This allows us to share and
13 matches
Mail list logo
