Re: [dev] Interesting post about X11

2010-06-20 Thread Robert Ransom
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:00:44 +0200 Alexander Teinum wrote: > > Use Scheme.  See Scheme 48 for a nice, simple > > implementation to start hacking on. > This thread is about a replacement for X, but we’re also discussing > development of “regular” applications. What exactly would

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > Not that there's anything wrong with BY-SA or any other CC licenses. It's a > matter of personal preference (though I'm personally never fond of SA-type > clauses, especially when they take on a viral bent). It is not a matter of personal p

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > > On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote: > >> The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some >> country behave differently). > > I used this in rc-httpd: > >        LICENSE > >  None.  rc-httpd i

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Ah, thanks. > > Grr, stupid laws, making me *think!* Of course, nobody's forcing you to go to any of those retarded countries. In fact, such countries are clearly led and populated by complete morons, so there's no reason to care what

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Jakub Lach
Dnia 20 czerwca 2010 23:16 Ethan Grammatikidis napisał(a): > I used this in rc-httpd: > > LICENSE > >None. rc-httpd is in the public domain, I give up all rights to it. >For countries without a concept of public domain, consider it > entirely >without owner. > > If

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:54, Kris Maglione wrote: On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:16:11PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote: The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some country behave differently). I used this in rc-

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:49:43PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote: WTFPL Lol, did not know that one! That's even better. I prefer BEER-WARE myself. -- Kris Maglione A program is portable to the extent that it can be easily moved to a new computing environment with much less effort t

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:16:11PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote: The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some country behave differently). I used this in rc-httpd: LICENSE None. rc-httpd

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:08, ⚖ Alexander Surma Surma wrote: The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some country behave differently). I used this in rc-httpd: LICENSE None. rc-httpd is in the public domain, I give up all rights to it. For countries

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Jakub Lach
Dnia 20 czerwca 2010 23:08 ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma napisał(a): > The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some > country behave differently). +

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Surma
The problem with public domain is, that it's not really global (some country behave differently). And whats wrong with CC-BY? or CC-SA? PS: I don't want to spark yet another license war! Just askin for reasons. Surma

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Uriel
Public domain, or if you really love CC, use CC0, all their other licenses are crap. uriel 2010/6/20 ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma : > I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA? > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Martin Kopta wrote: May I

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread hiro
Next time do your homework properly then. On 6/20/10, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote: >> WTFPL > Lol, did not know that one! That's even better. > > > -- > Alexander "cussing-makes-my-arguments-even-more-valid" Surma > >

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Surma
> WTFPL Lol, did not know that one! That's even better. -- Alexander "cussing-makes-my-arguments-even-more-valid" Surma

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Martin Kopta
> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA? WTFPL wall-suckless.tar.xz Description: Binary data

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Surma
I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA? On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Martin Kopta wrote: >>> May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;) >> Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to. > > please do so, bonus points

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Martin Kopta wrote: >> May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;) > Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to. please do so, bonus points for publishing it under a free license. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread hiro
Thank god suckless.org got to have a meaning.

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread ???
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:26:44 +0200 Martin Kopta wrote: > > May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;) > Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to. Yes, please.

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Martin Kopta
> May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;) Yes, of course. I can send you vectors if you want to.

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread ???
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:25:36 +0200 Martin Kopta wrote: > http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png > May I post this to another list? I think it's great ;)

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 20 Jun 2010, at 15:25, Martin Kopta wrote: http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png Once I started thinking of those things as alien jellyfish I started to like it. I'm not saying what my first thought was. ó.o

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Surma
You forgot "brutality" ;) On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote: >> >> http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png >> > > I can't help but notice that that conjures two, erm... not unrelated images. > > -- > Kris Maglione > > “Did God

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote: http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png I can't help but notice that that conjures two, erm... not unrelated images. -- Kris Maglione “Did God have a mother?” Children, when told that God made the heavens and the earth, innocently ask whethe

[dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Martin Kopta
http://imgur.com/oPOeW.png

Re: [dev] Interesting post about X11

2010-06-20 Thread Alexander Teinum
> Use Scheme.  See Scheme 48 for a nice, simple > implementation to start hacking on. > This thread is about a replacement for X, but we’re also discussing development of “regular” applications. What exactly would you recommend Scheme for? -- Best regards, Alexander Teinum

Re: [dev] Fwd: [Patch] DWM: Add support for _NET_WM_DEMANDS_ATTENTION

2010-06-20 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:15:07AM +0200, Uli Schlachter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 20.06.2010 00:19, Kris Maglione wrote: On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:42:15PM +0200, Uli Schlachter wrote: a friend made me write the attached patch. It adds support for EWMH's _NET_W

Re: [dev] Fwd: [Patch] DWM: Add support for _NET_WM_DEMANDS_ATTENTION

2010-06-20 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 20.06.2010 00:19, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:42:15PM +0200, Uli Schlachter wrote: >> a friend made me write the attached patch. It adds support for EWMH's >> _NET_WM_DEMANDS_ATTENTION status by transfering it into ICCCM's ur