Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-06 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 23 Sep 2010, at 3:28 am, Wolf Tivy wrote: Can you explain what could go wrong? The predicate would be passed in the KeyRelease event (as an XPointer), and return True if it finds a KeyPress with matching time and keycode. Sorry, there is no problem. I didn't quite grasp the arbitrary

Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-06 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote: When something running in monocle mode has the X server tied up, whether grabbed or caught up in some buggy behaviour and you're trying to kill the offending app, what do you do? Hold down keys, like everyone does

Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-06 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 6 Oct 2010, at 10:01 pm, Kurt H Maier wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote: When something running in monocle mode has the X server tied up, whether grabbed or caught up in some buggy behaviour and you're trying to kill the offending app,

Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-06 Thread Wolf Tivy
Ok, I'm not sure I understand you on this one.  What you are talking about (killing apps) is not affected by my patch. If you mean that we should filter repeats globally in dwm, not just in this case, then I don't think it should be done. That feels like abstracting and re-interfacing the OS,