On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Patrick Haller
201009-suckl...@haller.ws wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:34:48PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
What would you choose for a really minimal OS?
arch linux, rolling binary releases reduce maintenance time.
what do you want a minimal os for?
I have recently tried and compared surf with uzbl. surf is much snapier and
manages all google related websites like a charm. the biggest drawback that
i find is its inability to remember passwords or usernames as I type them
into websites. this sort of negates its snappiness since i have to
You also might want to check gottox contribution to the wiki.
http://surf.suckless.org/files/autologin
basically it show how to use surfs cookiejar with external scripts. you most
likly need to adept it to ur site though..
kind regards,
cryptix
Hi,
Noone mentioned Slackware.
You can configure your system as minimal as you want it to.
Some supplied packages may have an old version (depending on your use),
but the slackbuilds.org supply pretty much anything you want. And you
can always compile what you need.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:06:38 +0100, Benoit Chesneau
bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Archlinux could be good, I used it in the past, but for sure I'm not
sure I want to use it again. Mostly due to some members of the french
community though. So it may be a bad reason ..
Yep, bad reason :) Just
Have anyone tried it?
http://www.etalabs.net/musl/
Hi Szabolcs,
On 4 February 2011 17:36, Szabolcs Nagy n...@port70.net wrote:
i recently implemented a webserver and used some code from quark in it
meanwhile i found minor issues in the code so here is a patch
(some modifications are bugfixes others are debateble,
i leave it to arg to sort it
tinycore ships with lightweight Xvesa and a very simple packaging system.
You don't have to strip anything off, but you'll have to add all
clutter by yourself. The base system is about 10 megs, but you can add
packages fast.
I would like to have more suckless folks sticking around, anybody can
